ClamAV works quite good. And yes, it needs some RAM as it loads the signatures into the RAM. So it is fast, when Mails are scanned. In my setting, it uses about 1,2 GB RAM. But so what? RAM is cheap and for little money you buy a lot of performance. It's not that cheap... with servers running as VP...

Btw, thanks for the sanesecurity hint... I wasn't aware of those definitions. :shock: Now I obviously have no other choice to add those to ClamAV as well :cry: :lol: ... So my ClamAV memory usage is now 625MB... Note that for normal operation, the available RAM kind of suffices. I just started notic...

I appreciate all the ideas and suggestions ... But using ClamWin would only make sense when it would be without ClamAV... Because my main motivation to do this would be to get rid of the ClamAV memory usage (by getting rid of ClamAV). In the mean time I learnt that the time ClamWin is taking is to l...

Thanks for the replies. I am indeed using ClamAV as a service and ClamWin as "desktop protection". Just thinking out loud a bit: - I'm using ESET nod32 on other computers as desktop protection, but I'm not sure whether it would install on Windows Server. If it would it would be worth figuring whethe...

Hi, I am long time HMailserver user and all this time I've been using ClamAV as my virus scanner. However, the amount of memory that ClamAV needs is getting rediculous. Right now it's jusing 575MB of RAM. I'm also running ClamWin, which could also be used for mail scanning, however, it takes 10+ sec...

. I've Horde running on it as well to try out ActiveSync, but it's not really stable (the ActiveSync part that is). Sorry for bringing this off topic but I use horde specifically for ActiveSync and it works great. The only hitch is ActiveSync itself, which is not implemented very well on many clien...

1. Yeah, I migrated from MS Exchange at the time (looong time ago) and moved to hMailserver. It's been working stable for me all the time with a few dozens of users and about a dozen domains. I quite infrequently install updates, but they always work fine for me. 2. Don't tie your Hmailserver to you...

Client fixed the signoff URL and now the domain is correctly parsed and SURBL has no match anymore. So for me problem solved, but I still think there is a bug in hMailserver with harvesting/parsing domain names from mails...

Ok, the client sent me a new mail that i can share (for testing purposes)... The problem occurred again, now with full logging on... but it does not show anything new.... "DEBUG" 10496 "2015-12-14 23:51:22.043" "Executing task AsynchronousTask in work queue Asynchronous task queue" "DEBUG" 10496 "20...

Thanks for looking into this. I will enable the extra logging. I'll ask permission to have the email body displayed here.

Just one thing to add, please note the incorrecly ended loglines when the domain is mentioned. There is no closing double quote and no CR.

Ok, I don't want clients that Google that domain to find this thread... But there are other ways I guess.

The domain is
t*r*a*i*n*2*coach.nl

(remove all the asterisks)

Hi, I am using hMailServer 5.6.3-B2249 on MSSQL. I use DNS and SURBL blacklist servers as well as SpamAssassin. I have a user that complained about not receiving mails from a specific sender. It turns out that these mails were rejected due to a SURBL match from multi.surbl.org (the only server I use...

Thanks for posting the script. I made a few changes to make the script a bit faster, but also fixed a pretty major flaw. - Flaw: When message is deleted, the oMessages collection changes. The Count goes down and not all messages are iterated anymore, resulting in not all mails being deleted that sho...