Search found 31 matches
- 2014-12-23 19:46
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Code: HM5033, Source: DALRecordset::Open, Description: MySQL: Query execution was interrupted
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10151
Re: Code: HM5033, Source: DALRecordset::Open, Description: MySQL: Query execution was interrupted
Whew! That was 2.5 years ago (5.4-B2011120101). I would think I would have if prompted. I wonder if the dependency was lost if I later re-installed/upgraded MySQL?
- 2014-12-23 19:38
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Can HMS send me an email when an error message is generated?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3009
- 2014-12-23 18:41
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Code: HM5033, Source: DALRecordset::Open, Description: MySQL: Query execution was interrupted
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10151
Re: Code: HM5033, Source: DALRecordset::Open, Description: MySQL: Query execution was interrupted
But Master Yoda, the dependency wasn't set in my installation, though my MySQL service name is "MySQL55". Could this have caused me to have the same HM5033 error messages occasionally ~3:20AM on Wednesdays when my server is automatically applying Windows Updates and restarting?
- 2014-12-23 18:23
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Can HMS send me an email when an error message is generated?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3009
Can HMS send me an email when an error message is generated?
Can I set up HMS to send me email when it creates one of its ERROR_hmailserver_[date].log files or entries? I didn't see anything about it in the options or forum messages.
- 2014-12-23 18:05
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Code: HM5033, Source: DALRecordset::Open, Description: MySQL: Query execution was interrupted
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10151
Re: Code: HM5033, Source: DALRecordset::Open, Description: MySQL: Query execution was interrupted
I'm guessing that if you look under Services you'll find that HMS doesn't have a dependency on the MySQL service.
- 2014-12-23 00:23
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: The right way to automatically stop HMS during Windows Update?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4724
The right way to automatically stop HMS during Windows Update?
Hello, We're happy long-time users of HMS. Recently when tracking down seemingly random email message loss, I discovered the losses (1-2 messages every 2 months or so) occurred during 3am, right when the system is restarting because of automatic Windows Update. HMS generates the error log entries be...
- 2013-04-09 15:02
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
I'm afraid I'm making a hash of the description. Let me describe it chronologically: Feb-2012 -------------- I have a HMS installation running 5.3.3. I need to convert it from MSSQL CE to MySQL. Bill helpfully offers a 2011120101 experimental build which will support full export and import with a ne...
- 2013-04-09 02:29
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
I think it worked because I exported the MySQL db from the old server and imported it into MySQL on the new server . The hms folders were just copied over from the old server. When the hms install was originally created on the old server I ran the first 5.4 installer--that's when the 5.3.3 to 5.4 co...
- 2013-04-08 23:30
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
WOW 3GB database? :o How is that even possible? You sure you didn't mean 3GB of EMAIL FILES? Bill Whups! Yes, it was 3GB of mail files!! When I set up the new server this weekend, I copied over the old server's hmailserver folder, installed 5.3.3. and immediately copied the 2011120101 experimental ...
- 2013-04-08 22:13
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
Thanks, Bill. So, back when I installed the 20111201 experimental in Feb. 2012 I should have installed the experimental files over hMailServer-5.4-B1931.exe , not over hMailServer-5.3.3-B1879.exe . Is that correct? At the time (Feb. 2012) I had a 3GB database running in 5.3.3, and needed to convert ...
- 2013-04-08 21:50
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
Bill, I know this is a crazy question, but back when you posted this helpful link for hmailbin-5.4-B2011120101.7z, was it supposed to be applied to an installation of hMailServer-5.3.3-B1879.exe or hmailserver-5.4-b1931.exe? I've just rebuilt our server and couldn't remember which installation was t...
- 2012-04-12 16:32
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7427
Re: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
a) catch-all? No, but I just set it up and had it forward to a non-mydomain address. It works and takes care of the in-mydomain Reply messages!
b) route? No. I don't understand how those work.... What would that do for my setup?
Thanks!
b) route? No. I don't understand how those work.... What would that do for my setup?
Thanks!
- 2012-04-11 15:16
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7427
Re: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
In my situation, I have a global Reply rule which sends a reply message. My HMS installation is set up to receive incoming email from our ISP for customer service email addresses (e.g. service@mydomain.com). The HMS installation does NOT receive email for all email addresses in our domain. It only s...
- 2012-04-09 16:13
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7427
Re: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
Update: After further testing, it turns out that #2 and #3 were not necessary. so, only the following was needed: 1. When testing the Reply rule, I was using an email address from the domain handled by HMS. My test machine, however, was checking this account directly from the POP server at the ISP. ...
- 2012-04-09 15:09
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7427
Re: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
I'm thankful to report that I have been able to get global rules to work. There were three factors: 1. When testing the Reply rule, I was using an email address from the domain handled by HMS. My test machine, however, was checking this account directly from the POP server at the ISP. The Reply rule...
- 2012-04-03 17:10
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7427
Re: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
I'm just wondering--does anyone else use Reply rules? Maybe I am doing something wrong in the rule definition?
- 2012-03-30 00:29
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7427
Re: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
SMTP logging was on and that's what it showed. I don't know why no SMTP-tagged log entries appear. There are other SMTP log entries in other places....
- 2012-03-29 18:28
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7427
Re: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
Thanks--yes, the reply email address matches an HMS account. I've tried the Reply rule as both an account rule and a global rule...
- 2012-03-29 17:15
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7427
Reply rule failing to send message, Code: HM5007
Hello-- Has anyone else been able to get Reply actions to work in a Rule? I have a global rule which triggers a Reply action. By watching the logs and the Data folder, I can verify that HMS (5.4-B2011120101) is creating the reply message. SMTP appears to be properly configured because a Forward rule...
- 2012-02-22 21:15
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
OK, I just tested it on a test server using a database with about 25000 messages (3GB of data). It seems to work fine! Thank you, Bill, for your work on this!! I think it will be a big help to others who want to convert an existing MS SQL CE installation to MySQL. So if I understand you correctly, t...
- 2012-02-22 16:34
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
I can do the test, but unfortunately I need a solution that will work for 5.3 (unless 5.4 can be deemed stable and advisable for production environments). Any chance of folding this in to a 5.3 variant?
I'll do the 5.4 test and let you know how it goes!
I'll do the 5.4 test and let you know how it goes!
- 2012-02-21 21:37
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
I can test it!
- 2012-02-21 20:34
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
Bill, that would be a BIG help. Thanks for checking into it!
- 2012-02-21 15:32
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
Re: 5.4 Backup feature
I noticed that the current 5.3 will back up all message and folder info into the hMailServerBackup.xml file even if Messages is UNchecked. I also am trying to migrate from MSSQL CE to MySQL. The .elm files in /data are fine. I'd like to use backup/restore to export the database records from the MS S...
- 2012-02-15 23:19
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: 5.4 Backup feature
- Replies: 41
- Views: 31435
5.4 Backup feature
Are the backups created with the new experimental facility in 5.4 something that can be restored to a 5.3 installation? The bigger backup and restore feature would be a BIG help. I'm on the verge of converting a 3GB database from MSSQL CE to MySQL and would really like to just use the HMA built-in B...
- 2011-11-03 20:18
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4730
Re: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users
For my users it seems to occur ~5% of the time when they move a message or delete a message.
- 2011-11-01 04:49
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4730
Re: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users
One thing I'm also going to try--one of the clients has client-based spam filtering: Norton Anti-Spam and Cloudmark. That might be a factor. I will test and report back.
- 2011-10-31 18:49
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4730
Re: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users
Thanks, Bill. If I can find a way to reproduce it, I will let you know!
Does the message ever herald a problem (e.g. the wrong message gets deleted), or is it just an irritant?
Michael
Does the message ever herald a problem (e.g. the wrong message gets deleted), or is it just an irritant?
Michael
- 2011-10-31 18:21
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4730
Re: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users
OK, so I have configured things so that each user has their own HMS account, and they are simultaneously accessing #Public folders using Outlook 2007. Should they still be intermittently seeing the "UID of a message changed unexpectedly" message? I wish we could make this with work without these gli...
- 2011-10-28 17:40
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4730
Re: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users
Thanks, Matt. Would you also recommend that the employees connect using multiple individual accounts for best reliability? (Note: the employees are not accessing any other email accounts via HMS, so they don't need personal Inboxes via HMS)
- 2011-10-28 17:09
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4730
Preferred solution for shared folders and multiple users?
Hello! I've searched and read everything I could find in the forums about this and wonder what the "recommended" solution is under hMailServer 5.3.3 for this situation. I have a customer support email address (on a POP3 server) that I download to HMS into a single Inbox (with shared sub-folders). Mu...