Search found 119 matches
- 2024-02-05 18:45
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Rule to Reply with HTML formatted text
- Replies: 7
- Views: 299
Re: Rule to Reply with HTML formatted text
Thank you both. I was hoping for HTML formatting right in the GUI, which would have been be easier to maintain for this small handful of accounts, but this will do. We avoid the loop count need because the outbound email is sent from a -noreply fake email address (which is still DKIM signed), so rep...
- 2024-02-05 16:37
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Rule to Reply with HTML formatted text
- Replies: 7
- Views: 299
Rule to Reply with HTML formatted text
Hi all- SUMMARY: Is there a way to have hMailServer html format reply emails sent using a rule? [ oh, and I've been trying to search the forums on this, but keep getting a 500 error. Is search down? ] We've got a couple mailboxes set up with a rule to automatically reply to the sender after each and...
- 2022-09-10 00:03
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Type-o in error message - No mail servers exists for the address.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4679
Re: Type-o in error message - No mail servers exists for the address.
Going down a wormhole here... No mail servers exist No mail server exists Both are right. The first speaks to not having any of the necessary serverS, the second is that there isn't even one. I'm down with either one to correct the grammatical mishmosh that's there now. This should be the top priori...
- 2022-09-09 22:43
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Type-o in error message - No mail servers exists for the address.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4679
- 2022-09-09 22:05
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Type-o in error message - No mail servers exists for the address.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4679
Re: Type-o in error message - No mail servers exists for the address.
Ready for nit-picky? Ready for nit picky???? Punctually, 4 question marks are not correct. (There should just be one). :mrgreen: 3 didn't seem like enough question marks and 5 would have been overkill. Please understand that I'm not the one who caught the mistake. It's surely been like this for an ...
- 2022-09-09 16:37
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Type-o in error message - No mail servers exists for the address.
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4679
Type-o in error message - No mail servers exists for the address.
Ready for nit picky???? It was reported to me that the bounce message "No mail servers exists for the address." is grammatically incorrect. It should be No mail servers exist for the address. https://www.hmailserver.com/documentation/latest/?page=reference_error_messages_smtp shows it was well. I've...
- 2022-09-07 01:34
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply Rule with HTML Formatting
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1196
Re: Reply Rule with HTML Formatting
Here's an example of a similar 'function' that I use, called from an account rule (based on number of retries) Function DelayedMailOneHour(oMessage) .... End Function Thanks Matt. The code is clear, and I do something similar for delay notifications based on our May 2017 (!!!) discussion. That's be...
- 2022-09-07 00:03
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply Rule with HTML Formatting
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1196
Re: Reply Rule with HTML Formatting
...So only solution to run a action from the rule, and then you set html body trough vbscript in eventhandlers.vbs That's what I feared. I'm afraid of having a hastily entered autoreply message in the EventHandlers.vbs file, make that vbs code invalid... It's also a pain to maintain outside of the ...
- 2022-09-06 22:36
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply Rule with HTML Formatting
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1196
Re: Reply Rule with HTML Formatting
Thank you both for the speedy reply. Some clarification: this isn't an auto-reply using hMailServer's out of office functionality, as that only sends the reply once per sender. This reply is being sent using a rule in hMailServer with a reply action. See attached image. I've confirmed that placing h...
- 2022-09-06 20:01
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Reply Rule with HTML Formatting
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1196
Reply Rule with HTML Formatting
It's been a minute! Hope all is well with everyone. We have a couple mailboxesthat have a rule set to reply to each and every inbound message with a standard reply. (You've reached the mailbox, we get back to you within a day. If you don't hear back or need urgent assistance, call). Several mailbox ...
- 2021-05-21 17:04
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3637
Re: hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
when configuring DNS back in the day when using days and weeks in SOA ... one could phuckup email for a week easy .. ask Sören.. he is so old he has to remember and has some good anecdotes regarding that... ... or wait he is so old he has propabally forgotten about the good old times .. :shock: Ah ...
- 2021-05-21 14:52
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3637
Re: hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
Thank you both for the insight and testing. I'm just glad that hmailserver does failover as it should. It definitely did exhibit this yesterday, but as had been pointed out, something else was likely seriously wrong with mail.mil
All seems normal now.
I love this community.
Thanks
All seems normal now.
I love this community.
Thanks
- 2021-05-21 02:56
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3637
Re: hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
I did a flush. The problem was that the:
mx1-whatever.mail.mil priority 10 didn't have an A record
mx-2whatever.mail.mil priority 20 also didn't have an A record
but
coast-guard-mx-whatever.usgc.mil priority 30 DID have an A record, but hmailserver didn't seem to try that.
mx1-whatever.mail.mil priority 10 didn't have an A record
mx-2whatever.mail.mil priority 20 also didn't have an A record
but
coast-guard-mx-whatever.usgc.mil priority 30 DID have an A record, but hmailserver didn't seem to try that.
- 2021-05-20 22:20
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3637
Re: hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
Thank you for the replies. They finally fixed the DNS issues, but my question wasn't specific to that. If neither mx1 and mx2 resolve, but mx3 does, shouldn't hMailServer try to send to mx3? That wasn't what was happening with the USGC.mil addresses. the primary and secondary mx servers were both ma...
- 2021-05-20 18:58
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3637
hMailServer not failing back to lower priority MX records?
Question summary: if a domain has say 3 MX servers listed: mx1.domain.com priority 10 mx2.domain.com priority 20 mx3.domain.com priority 30 but mx1 and mx2 are messed up in DNS and don't resolve to an ip address, shouldn't hMailServer try mx3's IP address to send mail? From what I'm seeing, that mig...
- 2020-07-13 14:50
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Do messages in outbound queue check the mx record each time?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1996
Re: Do messages in outbound queue check the mx record each time?
Excellent, thanks Matt!
- 2020-07-13 00:26
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Do messages in outbound queue check the mx record each time?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1996
Do messages in outbound queue check the mx record each time?
I'm going to be moving some servers around for a charity I work with. HMailServer acts as a relay for them. Their internal Exchange server's ip address is going to change. If hmailserver has messages in it's outbound SMTP queue, will it do an nslookup for the mx record for each recipient each time i...
- 2020-05-03 17:31
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: DKIM on reply from rule
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8503
Re: DKIM on reply from rule
IT'S WORKING. Outstanding. I had inadvertently extracted the 7z into a subfolder of /bin.
Terrific work.
Terrific work.
- 2020-05-03 05:29
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: DKIM on reply from rule
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8503
Re: DKIM on reply from rule
Yep. Rule in user@domain.com. reply rule sending as that same user@domain.com. regular auto reply is signed.
- 2020-05-02 19:02
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: DKIM on reply from rule
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8503
Re: DKIM on reply from rule
@RvdH, I have it a go. 5.6.8-B2505 installed over my existing installation without issue. I can see in the admin panel that this version is running. I've confirmed that a regular autoreply for that same account does sign just fine through hmailserver. However, a rule with a reply, using the same fro...
- 2020-05-02 00:28
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: DKIM on reply from rule
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8503
Re: DKIM on reply from rule
Outstanding. I'll give it a go likely next week. I appreciate all you've done for this community (And me).
- 2020-05-02 00:17
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: DKIM on reply from rule
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8503
Re: DKIM on reply from rule
I assumed your build was outdated, but now I see that the latest was built on 4/24. G-R-E-A-T
Stability is as good as the previous official release? Any known issues?
Stability is as good as the previous official release? Any known issues?
- 2020-05-01 23:29
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: DKIM on reply from rule
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8503
Re: DKIM on reply from rule
Thanks for the quick reply. We'll have to continue dealing with script replies not being DKIM signed. Messes with strict DMARC, but owell.
...breath held that a stable 5.7 release sees the light of day soon.
thanks for everything
...breath held that a stable 5.7 release sees the light of day soon.
thanks for everything
- 2020-05-01 21:01
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: DKIM on reply from rule
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8503
Re: DKIM on reply from rule
Heh, I must have missed your reply notification RvdH! So here I am, almost a year later, back at this issue again.
There seems to have been a little development work recently (mostly OpenSSL updates), but do you know if Martin integrated any of your changes in to 5.6.x?
Thanks!
There seems to have been a little development work recently (mostly OpenSSL updates), but do you know if Martin integrated any of your changes in to 5.6.x?
Thanks!
- 2019-05-08 16:02
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: DKIM on reply from rule
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8503
Re: DKIM on reply from rule
(Embarrassed that I didn't come across the known bug via search) I guess I'll try using a script for the rule based reply. Not optimal, but apparently the only way to quash this 4+ year old known bug / feature limitation. Many email providers, including gmail, are enforcing DMARC these days. That's ...
- 2019-05-08 05:16
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: DKIM on reply from rule
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8503
DKIM on reply from rule
I've DKIM setup on a subdomain without issue. We have a handful of accounts that send an automatic reply via a reply RULE (not an auto-reply from the auto-reply tab) so that senders get a reply for every single email they send to a given mailbox. This works, but the messages don't appear to be DKIM ...
- 2018-08-28 21:13
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10099
Re: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
For now, we need to remember to disable and then re-enable ... or just windows schedule a stop restart of the service in the dead of night. That will clear Amy cache that had since expired in the last 24 hours ready for the next 24 hours. It will still remain autonomous then. [Entered by mobile. Ex...
- 2018-08-28 19:38
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10099
Re: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
I always set with an expiration date because otherwise I'll forget to disable it.... Does that leave enabled checked on after it expires? I think it does. I sure it doesnt (unless you leave the Admin window open and dont refresh). I will find out over the next day or two during my tests. Tomorrow m...
- 2018-08-28 19:29
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: auto-reply scheduling
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9390
Re: auto-reply scheduling
I cannot get VacationMessageExpiresDate to accept a datetime format (it only accepts date format in the format "yyyy-mm-dd"). obAccount.VacationMessageExpiresDate = "2018-09-02" obAccount.save wscript.echo obAccount.VacationMessageExpiresDate No variation to the format will be accepted for Vacation...
- 2018-08-24 20:10
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: auto-reply scheduling
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9390
Re: auto-reply scheduling
I poked around the source code a little bit. Looking at PersistentAccount.cpp, line 404 starts the bit to see if it's time to switch off the VacationMessage as it's called internally. dtNow is set as type DateTime as is dtExpires. Line 411 does the check to see if the current dateTIME is after the e...
- 2018-08-24 16:24
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: auto-reply scheduling
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9390
Re: auto-reply scheduling
Thank you both. I'm always overly optimistic that feature requests with global appeal that should be easy to implement will be quickly implemented into the next release. I find myself passing out a lot from holding by breath though :shock: I guess I'll have to play with scripting for now. Mattg, you...
- 2018-08-24 16:19
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10099
Re: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
Thanks all for the input. Clarification: my users aren't setting the OOO, I am. I always set with an expiration date because otherwise I'll forget to disable it.... Does that leave enabled checked on after it expires? I think it does. When the lucky user goes away again, I update the message and the...
- 2018-08-23 21:25
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: auto-reply scheduling
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9390
Re: auto-reply scheduling
Hi again jimimaseye, I saw that nifty script before putting in the feature request. it's well thought out. Thanks for writing it. Unfortunately, there's a couple things that make it not quite right for my environment and needs - and I think the GUI idea would be universally helpful (not just for lit...
- 2018-08-23 21:12
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10099
Re: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
and I suppose we could still benefit from 1&2 even if the list of sender addresses remained in memory. They would just be lost at restart, but I generally don't restart frequently...
- 2018-08-23 20:39
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10099
Re: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
Hi jimimaseye, Thanks as always for your quick and to the point replies to the community. I genuinely appreciate the jab about backups, and you got me, sorta. I am not stopping the server each night and doing a backup. Instead, I'm backing up the system (which is a vm) on an bi-hourly basis (increme...
- 2018-08-23 17:12
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: auto-reply scheduling
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9390
auto-reply scheduling
I love love love the ability to automatically expire an out of office auto-reply. It makes my life so much easier, I don't have to scramble to deactivate users' out of office when they return. Feature requests to enhance auto-reply functionality: 1) Allow auto-reply messages to expire by date and TI...
- 2018-08-23 17:06
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: auto-reply, once per sender - reset
- Replies: 18
- Views: 10099
auto-reply, once per sender - reset
Hi all, I've got a couple users who insist on out of office auto-reply messages. Not my personal preference, but there's nothing I can do. hMailServer's auto-reply functionality works well. Once thing I noticed is that if I set an auto-expire for the previous out of office message and then the user ...
- 2017-06-17 00:23
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Carriage return in rule based reply
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1663
Carriage return in rule based reply
Is there a way to have carriage returns in the body of a reply that is triggered by a rule? I've tried hitting return and also shift return without success.
Thanks
Thanks
- 2017-06-13 21:29
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Queue information - show envelope
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4277
Re: Queue information - show envelope
This will add 3 new headers to the email if put into Sub OnAcceptMessage(oClient, oMessage) Sub XEnvelope(oMessage) Dim i, strEnvelope1, strEnvelope2 For i = 0 To oMessage.Recipients.Count-1 If (i = 0) Then strEnvelope1 = oMessage.Recipients(i).Address strEnvelope2 = oMessage.Recipients(i).Original...
- 2017-06-13 18:57
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Queue information - show envelope
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4277
Re: Queue information - show envelope
hMailserver is open source, so you can fork on Github >> https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailserver ALSO, you may want to look at this >> https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=30713 The people developing this have included a live queue, so perhaps you add more data there fairly eas...
- 2017-06-07 01:10
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Queue information - show envelope
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4277
Queue information - show envelope
Is there any chance of modifying hMailServer so that when we view a message file we can see the envelope? It would be nice to be able to see the mail-from, rcpt-to, and helo lines.
or is there another way?
or is there another way?
- 2017-05-26 13:16
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
Indeed, we are a light user outfit in comparison to yours. Although we dont need to use or implement it I still like the solution you have running and it fits operations such as yours very well (where long term retries are preferred). I would be interested, purely for statistical reasons and curios...
- 2017-05-26 12:26
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
I currently have my settings at what I think is the default - 4 tries, 5 minute interval. So if it fails and doesnt get delivered within 20 minutes we get the NDR anyway pretty quick anyway. Ive never seen a delay that has been attributable to anything other than an incorrectly addressed mail or (a...
- 2017-05-26 01:19
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Use Let's Encrypt Certificates with HM
- Replies: 55
- Views: 43694
Re: Use Let's Encrypt Certificates with HM
I'd previously done AutoDiscover for both Mozilla and Outlook. Auto-Discover for Mozilla required that each website be secured with SSL via https: and that an XML file is located in a specific directory. The certificate used for SSL to https needs to validate, but doesn't need to be the the same as...
- 2017-05-26 00:53
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
FWIW, Every time that my script has fired for me for real (I get a copy to my notification address too) it was because the message was addressed incorrectly and would ultimately be rejected anyway That's definitely not always the case though. Just today we saw a external mail server that some of ou...
- 2017-05-25 17:05
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Use Let's Encrypt Certificates with HM
- Replies: 55
- Views: 43694
Re: Use Let's Encrypt Certificates with HM
I am not very experienced at using Certificates but I'd like to ask why one would need more than one Certificate on hMailServer. I have multiple Domains on my hMailServer and use only one Certificate to Encrypt email from all of the Domains. I viewed the Certificate as verifying the Hostname of hMa...
- 2017-05-25 16:27
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
My opinion: Worst case scenario: an inconvenience (when all the stars align): .... Agree. The type A side of my personality calls this an imperfection. The type B says, "what are the chances?" and "good enough." BTW: I think it is a great little routine that's been implemented here by you guys and ...
- 2017-05-25 03:03
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
Glad it helps - thanks for the feedback I agree with Katip though, it is notification that the message was delayed, but continued delivery will be attempted. I see it as (in your case) that 12 delivery attempts have failed, but will keep trying. It is unknown whether it will work on attempt 13 or 2...
- 2017-05-24 22:39
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
Minor imperfection: The rules get run if the number of delivery attempts is reached. If we hit 13 attempts, it'll sent the 1 hour delay notice. However, we don't know that that 13th time will fail. In fact, this isn't an imperfection. HMS just notifies that it's been 1 hour since the message has no...
- 2017-05-24 19:17
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: Outgoing Retry Incremental Delay, Warning, etc
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7358
Re: Outgoing Retry Incremental Delay, Warning, etc
See my implementation details here.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=31278&p=196168#p196168
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=31278&p=196168#p196168
- 2017-05-24 19:17
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
I've got this working perfectly (well, almost perfectly, see my note at the end), so I figured I'd post the details here to help anyone else who is interested (and, apparently necessarily so that I don't ask this question a third time!!!) I have "Minutes between every retry" set to 15 under SMTP, wi...
- 2017-05-24 14:23
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
Other servers that I've worked with have allowed delay warnings to be sent after a configurable amount of time, essentially saying "we couldn't reach the recipient's server, we'll keep trying until _______." Even microsoft SMTP does this (incredibly). https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php...
- 2017-05-23 22:28
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
I dont know about the 'quickretries' feature as I havent actually used or tested it (I just knew those entries were there). I would be interesyted to see what your findings are. The NDR: sure, use the rule (if delivery attempts...') to call a script function where the function simply creates a new ...
- 2017-05-23 21:57
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Re: Delay Notifications
1) Is there any hope of this functionality being added to hMailServer? 2) Am I just missing a simple way of doing this? Yes there is. Use a global rule that says If "DELIVERY ATTEMPTS" equals 20 then action: [reply "message delayed. We are retrying etc....." or whatever.] But this doesn't show the ...
- 2017-05-23 21:06
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Delay Notifications
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12745
Delay Notifications
Hi all. I've got hMailServer set to retry delivering outgoing mail every 5 minutes for 576 tries (that's 48 hours). We've got constant issues with people simply mistyping outgoing domain names. If they mistype the username, they'll get a near immediate bounce from the recipient's server, but if they...
- 2016-09-15 01:23
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: Outgoing Retry Incremental Delay, Warning, etc
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7358
Re: Outgoing Retry Incremental Delay, Warning, etc
Simply terrific. Thank you!
- 2016-09-14 19:39
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Domain syntax checking - 550 A valid address is required.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3726
Re: Domain syntax checking - 550 A valid address is required.
I agree. We'll work to rename the exchange aliases.jimimaseye wrote:
So in other words, yes you can use underscores for an internet message except if it is forbidden by a specific RFC that overrules - in this case that would be RFC5321.
So yes, Soren, I agree. No error.
- 2016-09-14 16:40
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: Name and Email address of mailer-daemon. Copy errors to admin.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5238
Re: Name and Email address of mailer-daemon. Copy errors to admin.
When you have to stay on top of fighting Internet SPAM and "stoopid" users, you do not have time to care about NDR's... It's not really your problem that people can't spell/type the right address. Anyways, if you log SMTP you can find what you need to know in the log.. I agree wholeheartedly, but i...
- 2016-09-14 16:34
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: Name and Email address of mailer-daemon. Copy errors to admin.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5238
Re: Name and Email address of mailer-daemon. Copy errors to admin.
Easy peasy. Thanksmattg wrote:2. global rule
If FROM contains 'mailer-daemon'
AND
Recipient list NOT includes 'your-email@domain.com'
THEN
Forward to 'your-email@domain.com'
- 2016-09-14 16:33
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: Outgoing Retry Incremental Delay, Warning, etc
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7358
Re: Outgoing Retry Incremental Delay, Warning, etc
I do all of this with global rules + Scripts Use 'delivery attempts' as the thing to catch with the rule I use a function for an action so that I can send pretty HTML email back to the sender with a copy of their original email for delayed messages Great idea. So the rule is something like delivery...