Search found 3231 matches

by RvdH
2024-03-16 02:37
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: Still hmail or something new for the next server?
Replies: 19
Views: 3857

Re: Still hmail or something new for the next server?

What exactly are you using Proxmox for ?? Just asking as my server (5.6.9) seems to function flawlessly ... It's mainly an SMTP proxy in both directions (in/out) with classic Postfix + SA + ClamAV combo, all in a Debian box/VM with a good web UI, reports, monitors, quarantine, certs management etc....
by RvdH
2024-03-14 17:37
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: Spamhaus Blocklist (SBL) listings are moving
Replies: 4
Views: 846

Re: Spamhaus Blocklist (SBL) listings are moving

Such news always leave me wondering: what's the big deal with keeping them where they are? Weather networks or something moved their web service, and that killed weather applets in older Linuxae. Genius! Where nothing is to be gained, do not change! Is that too hard to understand? That's reminiscen...
by RvdH
2024-03-14 16:33
Forum: General discussions
Topic: need to remove autentication for some IP
Replies: 3
Views: 37

Re: need to remove autentication for some IP

thanks , tomorrow i'll check. what tab have the " Allow connections, Other: , Allow deliveries from and Require SMTP authentication " options ? i did not know why lan is 192.9.200.x, in the past someone made a bad error and now all lan is this... so is bad but change everything is worse.... Setting...
by RvdH
2024-03-14 15:18
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

strange things are happening there.... but is it due to HMS or something fishy in DNS!? Probably not related with HMS. Their MX with 0 (zero) priority returns outlook.com servers. My tests with 5.7.x -> Utilities -> MX-query confirms this. no problem. OTOH they might have something with their DNS i...
by RvdH
2024-03-14 14:03
Forum: General discussions
Topic: need to remove autentication for some IP
Replies: 3
Views: 37

Re: need to remove autentication for some IP

Easy, make a IP Range holding that device's ( static ) network IP (or the complete private network range, if you can not assign static ip), and then disable authentication for that range :!: Priority for that range needs to be higher then the Internet Range, for example 15 :!: Allow connections : SM...
by RvdH
2024-03-14 11:40
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

After clearing DNS cache 5.7.x -> Utilities -> MX-query Email address: test@logimore.com Mail servers: 52.101.73.26 52.101.73.15 52.101.68.25 52.101.68.21 52.101.73.6 52.101.73.8 52.101.68.12 After clearing it again, i got nothing but "ERROR" 8624 "2024-03-14 09:51:17.703" "Severity: 4 (Low), Code: ...
by RvdH
2024-03-14 10:15
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

5.7.x -> Utilities -> MX-query Email address: test@logimore.com Mail servers: 94.73.148.53 5.6.x -> Utilities -> MX-query Email address: test@logimore.com Mail servers: 52.101.73.26 52.101.73.15 52.101.68.25 52.101.68.21 52.101.73.6 52.101.73.8 52.101.68.12 Utilities ->Diagnostic fails for both (eg:...
by RvdH
2024-03-14 09:29
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

the fact it lookups www.logimore.com instead of logimore.com (eg: logimore.com CNAME to www.logimore.com), is somewhat strange i would say... usually it is used the other way around, eg: www.logimore.com CNAME to logimore.com ; <<>> DiG 9.16.48 <<>> logimore.com ANY ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got an...
by RvdH
2024-03-14 08:57
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

how to interpret this? (none of Antispam items is active in HMS) Too many CNAME (>10) mappings before getting to MX-record result(s)...at least i think that is what it means https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/blob/master/hmailserver/source/Server/Common/TCPIP/DNSResolver.cpp#L185-L191 I nev...
by RvdH
2024-03-14 08:51
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: Spamhaus Blocklist (SBL) listings are moving
Replies: 4
Views: 846

Re: Spamhaus Blocklist (SBL) listings are moving

Such news always leave me wondering: what's the big deal with keeping them where they are? Weather networks or something moved their web service, and that killed weather applets in older Linuxae. Genius! Where nothing is to be gained, do not change! Is that too hard to understand? That's reminiscen...
by RvdH
2024-03-12 15:33
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

Uh what???

All I offer is mod packages, no installers... the mod packages depend on a previously fully installed and working instance
There is a readme file included with instructions to use the mods, maybe you should read it!?
by RvdH
2024-03-12 14:26
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

See https://d-fault.nl/files/hMailServer-Builds Hello I used the build 5.7.0-B2643.9-OpenSSL-3.0.13.7z When I try to start the service I get an error message about the missing file LIBPQ.DLL wtf? Seems a PostgreSQL (related) error, can't help you much there.... (not using PostgreSQL) Does vanilla (...
by RvdH
2024-03-08 13:44
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

Yeah, as expected...i am not going to change anything (eg; repack it)
by RvdH
2024-03-08 11:25
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

bagu wrote:
2024-03-07 23:31
Hello,

The latest build is detected with Trojan:Script/Wacatac.B!ml
Is it normal ?
What AV? Most likely just a false positive, didn't do anything different that before
by RvdH
2024-03-07 10:52
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

Latest is 5.6.9-2641.67 Note FYI i have disabled download access to older versions of my custom builds, you from now on always should be redirected to the latest build when downloading Simply install the latest artifact from the URL below, then copy and overwrite files in this archive in hmailserve...
by RvdH
2024-03-07 09:16
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"
Replies: 7
Views: 109

Re: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"

The message flows just fine through hMailserver, it's the destination server that bounces it. I don't have the source to the application in question; it's actually the QNAP NAS notification system that doesn't have these formatted properly (Probably) not if you untick, Settings >> protocols >> RFC ...
by RvdH
2024-03-06 15:17
Forum: General discussions
Topic: 530 SMTP authentication is required
Replies: 36
Views: 407

Re: 530 SMTP authentication is required

Why fuck around with the default ranges? Restore them and start over! They are there for a reason (keep away from changing them if you do not have the knowledge or a specific reason to)
Everyone here, trying to help expects 127.0.0.1 to be the "My computer" range, not your LAN address
by RvdH
2024-03-06 11:42
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: Corona Virus
Replies: 482
Views: 765014

Re: Corona Virus

johang wrote:
2024-03-06 11:02
https://www.google.com/search?q=Man+Rec ... 9+Vaccines

I wonder if he made serious cash
If i had to guess, i would say it probably was palinka :mrgreen: :lol:
by RvdH
2024-03-06 10:21
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"
Replies: 7
Views: 109

Re: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"

Settings >> protocols >> RFC compliance >> "Allow incorrectly formatted line endings" I doubt that will change anything, as it is the receiving MTA that bounces the message (containing incorrectly formatted line ending) send through hmailserver. Fix the application that creates messages with incorr...
by RvdH
2024-03-06 10:06
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"
Replies: 7
Views: 109

Re: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"

Settings >> protocols >> RFC compliance >> "Allow incorrectly formatted line endings" I doubt that will change anything, as it is the receiving MTA that bounces the message (containing incorrectly formatted line ending) send through hmailserver. Fix the application that creates messages with incorr...
by RvdH
2024-03-06 10:01
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

mattg wrote:
2024-03-06 03:47
@RvdH
Do you publish a list of the changes specific to your 5.7 branch?
Have you tried the included readme.txt? :wink:
by RvdH
2024-03-04 23:41
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

If you are hesitated to add the complete 184.105.182.0/24 range you can always do something like this: ( courtesy of SorenR ) Sub OnHELO(oClient) Dim strRegEx strRegEx = "^(184\.105\.182\.(?:[0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1(?:[0-9][0-9])|2(?:[0-4][0-9]|5[0-5])))$" If Lookup(strRegEx, oClient.IPAddress) Then strRe...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 23:36
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

I, also, contacted them about this 'test' connection not knowing at the time what it was because it looked like someone was trying to use their servers to send email to me. The explanation I got was confusing but eventually was able to understand it was a 'test' connection of some sort. What was th...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 23:12
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

When my server is up (running normally) and if i directly send a mail to my domain using mxbackup1.junkemailfilter.com i get: Error in processing. The server response was: DEFER - Primary server [***] for domain [***] is online. Try that server If my server was actually down, missed mail during tha...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 23:00
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

i also have been running their backup MX for years without issues or getting spam from then.... palinka wanting evidence from us, people actually using the service with satisfaction, to counter his unsubstantiated claims it is a zombie is freaking ridiculous if not stupid! palinka can also do what ...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 22:57
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

palinka wrote:
2024-03-04 22:55
Get vaxxed.
Ran out of silly arguments? Poor little minion
by RvdH
2024-03-04 22:49
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

I'm curious why you trust junkemailfilter to send only ham. My understanding is that its basically a zombie service after the guy that created it died. I don't care if no one is running it, the backup MX service works, period! Funny how the topic magically changed. :lol: And i told you multiple tim...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 22:28
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

That page hasn't been changed in over 10 years. I know that because I looked at it many times while either messing around with my own setup or researching for questions asked on this forum. No, it looks like you're not paying attention. Show me evidence that someone is both running and updating jun...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 22:17
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

Additionally we do forward callout testing to make sure your server is actually down and we don't pass email if your server is running. The reason for this is that we don't want to be a back door spam source for your domain. So if your server is running we will return a 4xx error so that email will...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 22:11
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

I still don't see any evidence that anyone actually took over after the guy died. If you're having good luck with it, then great. Its a testament to how robust his system was. But that's not the same as actually, you know... being maintained. Why do you need that evidence? What is there to maintain...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 20:27
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

You claimed it in the code you posted - making it a trusted network in SA and excluding it from examination in EventHandlers.vbs. That isn't the same as not checking for spam at all, is it? ffs, those settings is not like whitelisting them! Both the DNS Blocklists as the backup MX service are worki...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 20:16
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

Our main business is spam filtering. It is our hope that once you try our free backup MX service that you will be impressed and you will see some spam reduction and you'll want to upgrade to full spam filtering. You do realize forwarding or sending spam is funest for their business model, right? Do...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 20:09
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

Our main business is spam filtering. It is our hope that once you try our free backup MX service that you will be impressed and you will see some spam reduction and you'll want to upgrade to full spam filtering.
You do realize forwarding or sending spam is funest for their business model, right?
by RvdH
2024-03-04 19:57
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

I'm curious why you trust junkemailfilter to send only ham. Where do i claim that? That said i never got a single spam message from them ( to my knowledge) It is no zombie service, it does exactly what it advertising to do https://www.junkemailfilter.com/spam/free_mx_backup_service.html It even doe...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 14:55
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

However, long ago I gave up on Greylisting because the IP Addresses changed so much and I didn't list the entire IP 184.105.182.0/24 as Incoming Relays. For one thing how do I know that entire IP Address Range belonged to junkemailfilter.com. It is listed as such in their SPF record, not? And for u...
by RvdH
2024-03-04 12:15
Forum: General discussions
Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Replies: 36
Views: 5558

Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM

Do you still use junkemailfilter.com as an MX Backup Email Filter? I uses it as well, this is how i solved it In hMailServer relays i have: (taken from SPF record, i checked my logs and i only receive mails from 184.105.182.0/24 range) Name: 184.105.182.0/24 (junkemailfilter.com) Lower IP: 184.105.1...
by RvdH
2024-03-03 14:03
Forum: General discussions
Topic: I sure could use some help with a problem involving POP & IMAP
Replies: 5
Views: 75

Re: I sure could use some help with a problem involving POP & IMAP

hMailServer 5.6.7-82425 I've been using hMailServer for years. I have it going to different mail servers and downloading (using POP) various accounts to the one Windows (now 11) box that runs it. Then, Outlook clients on the lan contact hMailServer and each gets the mail destined for that account. ...
by RvdH
2024-03-03 13:54
Forum: Scripting
Topic: only allow authentication of one or more users if they're using a specific ip address
Replies: 12
Views: 198

Re: only allow authentication of one or more users if they're using a specific ip address

I *think* you can use the same code in OnClientLogon to boot non-authorized username/IP combinations from IMAP and POP3. Sub OnClientLogon(oClient) If oClient.Port <> 25 Then If oClient.Username = "test@test.com" And oClient.IPAddress = "192.168.0.10" Then EventLog.Write(oClient.Username & " on IP ...
by RvdH
2024-03-03 13:41
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

mikhalkin wrote:
2024-02-26 21:08
RvdH wrote:
2024-02-03 12:59
Sorry forgot to update the changelog...
Latest is 5.6.9-2641.65
Hello.

Will the OpenSSL library be updated to version 3.0?
See https://d-fault.nl/files/hMailServer-Builds
by RvdH
2024-03-01 10:35
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SMTP Timeout "after initial connection"
Replies: 4
Views: 80

Re: SMTP Timeout "after initial connection"

BartKindt wrote:
2024-03-01 10:26
And should port 25 then be Open or should I set STARTTLS required?
OPTIONAL :!:
by RvdH
2024-02-29 22:44
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SMTP Timeout "after initial connection"
Replies: 4
Views: 80

Re: SMTP Timeout "after initial connection"

Yup, the world (server to server) uses port 25 by default. Without port 25 open you won't be able to receive any mail from the outside world
Port 587 in most circumstances is only for clients and (often) requires AUTH
by RvdH
2024-02-18 11:10
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Backup and restore issue
Replies: 23
Views: 522

Re: Backup and restore issue

One way or the other, it probably is easier to just fix the routes used in rules after a restore. I mean, how many would actually backup and restore and the same server? I used backup/restore only when migrating to a new server (HMS 5.7.x on Windows Server 2022) never on the same machine I verified ...
by RvdH
2024-02-17 23:24
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Backup and restore issue
Replies: 23
Views: 522

Re: Backup and restore issue

SorenR wrote:
2024-02-17 21:39
SQL CE does not support TRUNCATE command.
Good reason to switch to a 'real' database while restoring 😂

As workarround, delete rows and reset auto increment value?

Code: Select all

DBCC CHECKIDENT('tableName', RESEED, 0)
Not sure this command is available for MSSQL CE
by RvdH
2024-02-17 19:32
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Backup and restore issue
Replies: 23
Views: 522

Re: Backup and restore issue

As far as i test,even fresh tables,same issue. For example,i have a new server,fresh install with nothing set,then i restore from my other server config xml. All install same disk and path. Such thing happen. Yeah i noticed this a while back using a clean install.... but a clean install also has de...
by RvdH
2024-02-17 17:49
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Backup and restore issue
Replies: 23
Views: 522

Re: Backup and restore issue

Seems i found the issue: For example,you have 5 routes,then the routeid is from 1-5. When you backup,it is from 1-5,but when you restore,the routeid is from 6-10,when you run restore again,it becomes 11-15,but the xml file,the matching routeid should be 1-5 The database hm_routes>routeid change iss...
by RvdH
2024-02-08 00:55
Forum: General discussions
Topic: GEOIP COUNTRY BLOCK
Replies: 20
Views: 557

Re: GEOIP COUNTRY BLOCK

I also archived those files back in the day, eg: https://d-fault.nl/files/GeoIP-COM-1.3.zip https://d-fault.nl/files/GeoIP_MSCOM_64bit.pdf Function getCountryCode(ByVal StrIP) getCountryCode = "Unknown" If Len(StrIP) > 0 Then On Error Resume Next With CreateObject("GeoIPCOMEx.GeoIPEx") .set_db_path(...
by RvdH
2024-02-06 10:29
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

First thing I checked, Largest email on server is ~47 MB .... IIRC this is the actual size "iSize 323692, iByteStart 0, iByteCount 323692." Yes, but the peek command never succeeds, it ends after fetching 0.03 MBytes (323692 bytes) with the error you see in the log file. But if the peek command wou...
by RvdH
2024-02-05 13:31
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

Why wait 4/5 months? You have the specific (Apple) client and the particular email, but you say can't reproduce the error? FYI, If (bytes) EQUALS if (bytes->GetSize() > 0) in 5.6.x If (!bytes) means empty, so If (bytes) means not empty and therefor always has a length [edit] Mmm, that seems not ent...
by RvdH
2024-02-03 21:19
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

How do you mean? Why wait 4/5 months? You have the specific (Apple) client and the particular email, but you say can't reproduce the error? FYI, If (bytes) EQUALS if (bytes->GetSize() > 0) in 5.6.x If (!bytes) means empty, so If (bytes) means not empty and therefor always has a length [edit] Mmm, t...
by RvdH
2024-02-03 20:45
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

SorenR wrote:
2024-02-03 20:33
How do you mean?
Why wait 4/5 months? You have the specific (Apple) client and the particular email, but you say can't reproduce the error?

FYI, If (bytes) EQUALS if (bytes->GetSize() > 0)

in 5.6.x If (!bytes) means empty, so If (bytes) means not empty and therefor always has a length
by RvdH
2024-02-03 20:13
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

SorenR wrote:
2024-02-03 20:02
But yes, must be client error/bug and hMailServer does not expect that to happen, ever :roll:
If (bytes) or if (bytes->GetSize() > 0) should prevent that from happening, can't you simply check with that particular eml (UID 46984)?
by RvdH
2024-02-03 19:13
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

An error occured while parsing data. Data length: 49, Data: 66 UID FETCH 46984 BODY.PEEK[]<323692.4294967295>. Remote IP: 217.71.2.254" This line means that hMailServer is trying read the body content of the email with uid 46984 but get's trouble while parsing the body only content. It happens as 3...
by RvdH
2024-02-03 19:11
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

I have let the IMAP and DEBUG log active for a few hours (since 14h) 24.132.17.244 is a client who i know is using Apple gear... "IMAPD" 3456 1918 "2024-02-03 17:38:28.990" "24.132.17.244" "RECEIVED: 38 UID FETCH 176697 BODY.PEEK[]" "DEBUG" 3456 "2024-02-03 17:38:28.990" "ReadFileToBuf -> bytes size...
by RvdH
2024-02-03 15:20
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

@SorenR Does it only occur while backing up/archiving eml for example? As I only can seem to trigger it when i download the complete *.eml within roundcube for example, every other operation won't show the LOG_DEBUG line below LOG_DEBUG(Formatter::Format("ReadFileToBuf -> bytes size: {0}", bytes->Ge...
by RvdH
2024-02-03 12:59
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Replies: 526
Views: 606026

Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?

Sorry forgot to update the changelog... Latest is 5.6.9-2641.65 Note FYI i have disabled download access to older versions of my custom builds, you from now on always should be redirected to the latest build when downloading Simply install the latest artifact from the URL below, then copy and overwr...
by RvdH
2024-02-02 11:09
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

SorenR wrote:
2024-02-01 21:23
You having fun?
What is your problem exactly? First of all the diff is your crap... inspired by/copy and pasted from, whatever you like to call it
No one is allowed to verify your changes?
by RvdH
2024-02-01 17:20
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

If "std::shared_ptr<ByteBuffer> bytes = file.ReadChunk(iCount);" returns EMPTY it is the same as "memcpy(OutBuf, EMPTY, iCount);" and the way I read it EMPTY ~ NULL You do check if bytes != empty (eg: if (bytes)) in the 5.6.x diff posted, so how on earth could it pass empty to memcp??? diff --git a...
by RvdH
2024-02-01 15:43
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

The "If (bytes)" statement is inspired by code elsewhere in hMailServer using code similar to "std::shared_ptr<ByteBuffer> bytes = file.ReadChunk(iCount);" Yeah, that seems to be it, there is a weird inconsistency in File.cpp ReadChunk between 5.6.x. and 5.7 5.6.x https://github.com/hmailserver/hma...
by RvdH
2024-02-01 13:16
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Minidump...
Replies: 36
Views: 3746

Re: Minidump...

The "If (bytes)" statement is inspired by code elsewhere in hMailServer using code similar to "std::shared_ptr<ByteBuffer> bytes = file.ReadChunk(iCount);" Yeah, that seems to be it, there is a weird inconsistency in File.cpp ReadChunk between 5.6.x. and 5.7 5.6.x https://github.com/hmailserver/hma...
by RvdH
2024-01-27 11:57
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Distribution list export
Replies: 7
Views: 2010

Re: Distribution list export

Getting an error with this code. It's looking for an additional ( or something. ...."an addional" what? Detail. Logs. Give us something to work with. If lcase(oDomain.DistributionLists.Item(k).Address) = lcase(DistListName &"@" & YourDomain) Then For j = 0 To oMessage .Recipients.Count -1 For i = 0...