Search found 3231 matches
- 2024-03-16 02:37
- Forum: Off-topic discussions
- Topic: Still hmail or something new for the next server?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3858
Re: Still hmail or something new for the next server?
What exactly are you using Proxmox for ?? Just asking as my server (5.6.9) seems to function flawlessly ... It's mainly an SMTP proxy in both directions (in/out) with classic Postfix + SA + ClamAV combo, all in a Debian box/VM with a good web UI, reports, monitors, quarantine, certs management etc....
- 2024-03-14 17:37
- Forum: Off-topic discussions
- Topic: Spamhaus Blocklist (SBL) listings are moving
- Replies: 4
- Views: 847
Re: Spamhaus Blocklist (SBL) listings are moving
Such news always leave me wondering: what's the big deal with keeping them where they are? Weather networks or something moved their web service, and that killed weather applets in older Linuxae. Genius! Where nothing is to be gained, do not change! Is that too hard to understand? That's reminiscen...
- 2024-03-14 16:33
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: need to remove autentication for some IP
- Replies: 3
- Views: 37
Re: need to remove autentication for some IP
thanks , tomorrow i'll check. what tab have the " Allow connections, Other: , Allow deliveries from and Require SMTP authentication " options ? i did not know why lan is 192.9.200.x, in the past someone made a bad error and now all lan is this... so is bad but change everything is worse.... Setting...
- 2024-03-14 15:18
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
strange things are happening there.... but is it due to HMS or something fishy in DNS!? Probably not related with HMS. Their MX with 0 (zero) priority returns outlook.com servers. My tests with 5.7.x -> Utilities -> MX-query confirms this. no problem. OTOH they might have something with their DNS i...
- 2024-03-14 14:03
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: need to remove autentication for some IP
- Replies: 3
- Views: 37
Re: need to remove autentication for some IP
Easy, make a IP Range holding that device's ( static ) network IP (or the complete private network range, if you can not assign static ip), and then disable authentication for that range :!: Priority for that range needs to be higher then the Internet Range, for example 15 :!: Allow connections : SM...
- 2024-03-14 11:40
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
After clearing DNS cache 5.7.x -> Utilities -> MX-query Email address: test@logimore.com Mail servers: 52.101.73.26 52.101.73.15 52.101.68.25 52.101.68.21 52.101.73.6 52.101.73.8 52.101.68.12 After clearing it again, i got nothing but "ERROR" 8624 "2024-03-14 09:51:17.703" "Severity: 4 (Low), Code: ...
- 2024-03-14 10:15
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
5.7.x -> Utilities -> MX-query Email address: test@logimore.com Mail servers: 94.73.148.53 5.6.x -> Utilities -> MX-query Email address: test@logimore.com Mail servers: 52.101.73.26 52.101.73.15 52.101.68.25 52.101.68.21 52.101.73.6 52.101.73.8 52.101.68.12 Utilities ->Diagnostic fails for both (eg:...
- 2024-03-14 09:29
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
the fact it lookups www.logimore.com instead of logimore.com (eg: logimore.com CNAME to www.logimore.com), is somewhat strange i would say... usually it is used the other way around, eg: www.logimore.com CNAME to logimore.com ; <<>> DiG 9.16.48 <<>> logimore.com ANY ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got an...
- 2024-03-14 08:57
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
how to interpret this? (none of Antispam items is active in HMS) Too many CNAME (>10) mappings before getting to MX-record result(s)...at least i think that is what it means https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/blob/master/hmailserver/source/Server/Common/TCPIP/DNSResolver.cpp#L185-L191 I nev...
- 2024-03-14 08:51
- Forum: Off-topic discussions
- Topic: Spamhaus Blocklist (SBL) listings are moving
- Replies: 4
- Views: 847
Re: Spamhaus Blocklist (SBL) listings are moving
Such news always leave me wondering: what's the big deal with keeping them where they are? Weather networks or something moved their web service, and that killed weather applets in older Linuxae. Genius! Where nothing is to be gained, do not change! Is that too hard to understand? That's reminiscen...
- 2024-03-12 15:33
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Uh what???
All I offer is mod packages, no installers... the mod packages depend on a previously fully installed and working instance
There is a readme file included with instructions to use the mods, maybe you should read it!?
All I offer is mod packages, no installers... the mod packages depend on a previously fully installed and working instance
There is a readme file included with instructions to use the mods, maybe you should read it!?
- 2024-03-12 14:26
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
See https://d-fault.nl/files/hMailServer-Builds Hello I used the build 5.7.0-B2643.9-OpenSSL-3.0.13.7z When I try to start the service I get an error message about the missing file LIBPQ.DLL wtf? Seems a PostgreSQL (related) error, can't help you much there.... (not using PostgreSQL) Does vanilla (...
- 2024-03-08 13:44
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Yeah, as expected...i am not going to change anything (eg; repack it)
- 2024-03-08 11:25
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
- 2024-03-07 10:52
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Latest is 5.6.9-2641.67 Note FYI i have disabled download access to older versions of my custom builds, you from now on always should be redirected to the latest build when downloading Simply install the latest artifact from the URL below, then copy and overwrite files in this archive in hmailserve...
- 2024-03-07 09:16
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 109
Re: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"
The message flows just fine through hMailserver, it's the destination server that bounces it. I don't have the source to the application in question; it's actually the QNAP NAS notification system that doesn't have these formatted properly (Probably) not if you untick, Settings >> protocols >> RFC ...
- 2024-03-06 15:17
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: 530 SMTP authentication is required
- Replies: 36
- Views: 410
Re: 530 SMTP authentication is required
Why fuck around with the default ranges? Restore them and start over! They are there for a reason (keep away from changing them if you do not have the knowledge or a specific reason to)
Everyone here, trying to help expects 127.0.0.1 to be the "My computer" range, not your LAN address
Everyone here, trying to help expects 127.0.0.1 to be the "My computer" range, not your LAN address
- 2024-03-06 11:42
- Forum: Off-topic discussions
- Topic: Corona Virus
- Replies: 482
- Views: 766166
Re: Corona Virus
If i had to guess, i would say it probably was palinkajohang wrote: ↑2024-03-06 11:02https://www.google.com/search?q=Man+Rec ... 9+Vaccines
I wonder if he made serious cash
- 2024-03-06 10:21
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 109
Re: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"
Settings >> protocols >> RFC compliance >> "Allow incorrectly formatted line endings" I doubt that will change anything, as it is the receiving MTA that bounces the message (containing incorrectly formatted line ending) send through hmailserver. Fix the application that creates messages with incorr...
- 2024-03-06 10:06
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 109
Re: Dealing with "Message contains bare LF"
Settings >> protocols >> RFC compliance >> "Allow incorrectly formatted line endings" I doubt that will change anything, as it is the receiving MTA that bounces the message (containing incorrectly formatted line ending) send through hmailserver. Fix the application that creates messages with incorr...
- 2024-03-06 10:01
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
- 2024-03-04 23:41
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
If you are hesitated to add the complete 184.105.182.0/24 range you can always do something like this: ( courtesy of SorenR ) Sub OnHELO(oClient) Dim strRegEx strRegEx = "^(184\.105\.182\.(?:[0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1(?:[0-9][0-9])|2(?:[0-4][0-9]|5[0-5])))$" If Lookup(strRegEx, oClient.IPAddress) Then strRe...
- 2024-03-04 23:36
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
I, also, contacted them about this 'test' connection not knowing at the time what it was because it looked like someone was trying to use their servers to send email to me. The explanation I got was confusing but eventually was able to understand it was a 'test' connection of some sort. What was th...
- 2024-03-04 23:12
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
When my server is up (running normally) and if i directly send a mail to my domain using mxbackup1.junkemailfilter.com i get: Error in processing. The server response was: DEFER - Primary server [***] for domain [***] is online. Try that server If my server was actually down, missed mail during tha...
- 2024-03-04 23:00
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
i also have been running their backup MX for years without issues or getting spam from then.... palinka wanting evidence from us, people actually using the service with satisfaction, to counter his unsubstantiated claims it is a zombie is freaking ridiculous if not stupid! palinka can also do what ...
- 2024-03-04 22:57
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
- 2024-03-04 22:49
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
I'm curious why you trust junkemailfilter to send only ham. My understanding is that its basically a zombie service after the guy that created it died. I don't care if no one is running it, the backup MX service works, period! Funny how the topic magically changed. :lol: And i told you multiple tim...
- 2024-03-04 22:28
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
That page hasn't been changed in over 10 years. I know that because I looked at it many times while either messing around with my own setup or researching for questions asked on this forum. No, it looks like you're not paying attention. Show me evidence that someone is both running and updating jun...
- 2024-03-04 22:17
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Additionally we do forward callout testing to make sure your server is actually down and we don't pass email if your server is running. The reason for this is that we don't want to be a back door spam source for your domain. So if your server is running we will return a 4xx error so that email will...
- 2024-03-04 22:11
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
I still don't see any evidence that anyone actually took over after the guy died. If you're having good luck with it, then great. Its a testament to how robust his system was. But that's not the same as actually, you know... being maintained. Why do you need that evidence? What is there to maintain...
- 2024-03-04 20:27
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
You claimed it in the code you posted - making it a trusted network in SA and excluding it from examination in EventHandlers.vbs. That isn't the same as not checking for spam at all, is it? ffs, those settings is not like whitelisting them! Both the DNS Blocklists as the backup MX service are worki...
- 2024-03-04 20:16
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Our main business is spam filtering. It is our hope that once you try our free backup MX service that you will be impressed and you will see some spam reduction and you'll want to upgrade to full spam filtering. You do realize forwarding or sending spam is funest for their business model, right? Do...
- 2024-03-04 20:09
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
You do realize forwarding or sending spam is funest for their business model, right?Our main business is spam filtering. It is our hope that once you try our free backup MX service that you will be impressed and you will see some spam reduction and you'll want to upgrade to full spam filtering.
- 2024-03-04 19:57
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
I'm curious why you trust junkemailfilter to send only ham. Where do i claim that? That said i never got a single spam message from them ( to my knowledge) It is no zombie service, it does exactly what it advertising to do https://www.junkemailfilter.com/spam/free_mx_backup_service.html It even doe...
- 2024-03-04 14:55
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
However, long ago I gave up on Greylisting because the IP Addresses changed so much and I didn't list the entire IP 184.105.182.0/24 as Incoming Relays. For one thing how do I know that entire IP Address Range belonged to junkemailfilter.com. It is listed as such in their SPF record, not? And for u...
- 2024-03-04 12:15
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5558
Re: How To Whitelist MX Email Backup Servers Forwarding As Not SPAM
Do you still use junkemailfilter.com as an MX Backup Email Filter? I uses it as well, this is how i solved it In hMailServer relays i have: (taken from SPF record, i checked my logs and i only receive mails from 184.105.182.0/24 range) Name: 184.105.182.0/24 (junkemailfilter.com) Lower IP: 184.105.1...
- 2024-03-03 14:03
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: I sure could use some help with a problem involving POP & IMAP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 75
Re: I sure could use some help with a problem involving POP & IMAP
hMailServer 5.6.7-82425 I've been using hMailServer for years. I have it going to different mail servers and downloading (using POP) various accounts to the one Windows (now 11) box that runs it. Then, Outlook clients on the lan contact hMailServer and each gets the mail destined for that account. ...
- 2024-03-03 13:54
- Forum: Scripting
- Topic: only allow authentication of one or more users if they're using a specific ip address
- Replies: 12
- Views: 199
Re: only allow authentication of one or more users if they're using a specific ip address
I *think* you can use the same code in OnClientLogon to boot non-authorized username/IP combinations from IMAP and POP3. Sub OnClientLogon(oClient) If oClient.Port <> 25 Then If oClient.Username = "test@test.com" And oClient.IPAddress = "192.168.0.10" Then EventLog.Write(oClient.Username & " on IP ...
- 2024-03-03 13:41
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
- 2024-03-01 10:35
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: SMTP Timeout "after initial connection"
- Replies: 4
- Views: 80
- 2024-02-29 22:44
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: SMTP Timeout "after initial connection"
- Replies: 4
- Views: 80
Re: SMTP Timeout "after initial connection"
Yup, the world (server to server) uses port 25 by default. Without port 25 open you won't be able to receive any mail from the outside world
Port 587 in most circumstances is only for clients and (often) requires AUTH
Port 587 in most circumstances is only for clients and (often) requires AUTH
- 2024-02-18 11:10
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Backup and restore issue
- Replies: 23
- Views: 522
Re: Backup and restore issue
One way or the other, it probably is easier to just fix the routes used in rules after a restore. I mean, how many would actually backup and restore and the same server? I used backup/restore only when migrating to a new server (HMS 5.7.x on Windows Server 2022) never on the same machine I verified ...
- 2024-02-17 23:24
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Backup and restore issue
- Replies: 23
- Views: 522
Re: Backup and restore issue
Good reason to switch to a 'real' database while restoring
As workarround, delete rows and reset auto increment value?
Code: Select all
DBCC CHECKIDENT('tableName', RESEED, 0)
- 2024-02-17 19:32
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Backup and restore issue
- Replies: 23
- Views: 522
Re: Backup and restore issue
As far as i test,even fresh tables,same issue. For example,i have a new server,fresh install with nothing set,then i restore from my other server config xml. All install same disk and path. Such thing happen. Yeah i noticed this a while back using a clean install.... but a clean install also has de...
- 2024-02-17 17:49
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Backup and restore issue
- Replies: 23
- Views: 522
Re: Backup and restore issue
Seems i found the issue: For example,you have 5 routes,then the routeid is from 1-5. When you backup,it is from 1-5,but when you restore,the routeid is from 6-10,when you run restore again,it becomes 11-15,but the xml file,the matching routeid should be 1-5 The database hm_routes>routeid change iss...
- 2024-02-08 00:55
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: GEOIP COUNTRY BLOCK
- Replies: 20
- Views: 557
Re: GEOIP COUNTRY BLOCK
I also archived those files back in the day, eg: https://d-fault.nl/files/GeoIP-COM-1.3.zip https://d-fault.nl/files/GeoIP_MSCOM_64bit.pdf Function getCountryCode(ByVal StrIP) getCountryCode = "Unknown" If Len(StrIP) > 0 Then On Error Resume Next With CreateObject("GeoIPCOMEx.GeoIPEx") .set_db_path(...
- 2024-02-06 10:29
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
First thing I checked, Largest email on server is ~47 MB .... IIRC this is the actual size "iSize 323692, iByteStart 0, iByteCount 323692." Yes, but the peek command never succeeds, it ends after fetching 0.03 MBytes (323692 bytes) with the error you see in the log file. But if the peek command wou...
- 2024-02-05 13:31
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
Why wait 4/5 months? You have the specific (Apple) client and the particular email, but you say can't reproduce the error? FYI, If (bytes) EQUALS if (bytes->GetSize() > 0) in 5.6.x If (!bytes) means empty, so If (bytes) means not empty and therefor always has a length [edit] Mmm, that seems not ent...
- 2024-02-03 21:19
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
How do you mean? Why wait 4/5 months? You have the specific (Apple) client and the particular email, but you say can't reproduce the error? FYI, If (bytes) EQUALS if (bytes->GetSize() > 0) in 5.6.x If (!bytes) means empty, so If (bytes) means not empty and therefor always has a length [edit] Mmm, t...
- 2024-02-03 20:45
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
Why wait 4/5 months? You have the specific (Apple) client and the particular email, but you say can't reproduce the error?
FYI, If (bytes) EQUALS if (bytes->GetSize() > 0)
in 5.6.x If (!bytes) means empty, so If (bytes) means not empty and therefor always has a length
- 2024-02-03 20:13
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
- 2024-02-03 19:13
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
An error occured while parsing data. Data length: 49, Data: 66 UID FETCH 46984 BODY.PEEK[]<323692.4294967295>. Remote IP: 217.71.2.254" This line means that hMailServer is trying read the body content of the email with uid 46984 but get's trouble while parsing the body only content. It happens as 3...
- 2024-02-03 19:11
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
I have let the IMAP and DEBUG log active for a few hours (since 14h) 24.132.17.244 is a client who i know is using Apple gear... "IMAPD" 3456 1918 "2024-02-03 17:38:28.990" "24.132.17.244" "RECEIVED: 38 UID FETCH 176697 BODY.PEEK[]" "DEBUG" 3456 "2024-02-03 17:38:28.990" "ReadFileToBuf -> bytes size...
- 2024-02-03 15:20
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
@SorenR Does it only occur while backing up/archiving eml for example? As I only can seem to trigger it when i download the complete *.eml within roundcube for example, every other operation won't show the LOG_DEBUG line below LOG_DEBUG(Formatter::Format("ReadFileToBuf -> bytes size: {0}", bytes->Ge...
- 2024-02-03 12:59
- Forum: Development & alpha discussions
- Topic: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
- Replies: 526
- Views: 606153
Re: Sub OnHELO(oClient) progress?
Sorry forgot to update the changelog... Latest is 5.6.9-2641.65 Note FYI i have disabled download access to older versions of my custom builds, you from now on always should be redirected to the latest build when downloading Simply install the latest artifact from the URL below, then copy and overwr...
- 2024-02-02 11:09
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
- 2024-02-01 17:20
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
If "std::shared_ptr<ByteBuffer> bytes = file.ReadChunk(iCount);" returns EMPTY it is the same as "memcpy(OutBuf, EMPTY, iCount);" and the way I read it EMPTY ~ NULL You do check if bytes != empty (eg: if (bytes)) in the 5.6.x diff posted, so how on earth could it pass empty to memcp??? diff --git a...
- 2024-02-01 15:43
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
The "If (bytes)" statement is inspired by code elsewhere in hMailServer using code similar to "std::shared_ptr<ByteBuffer> bytes = file.ReadChunk(iCount);" Yeah, that seems to be it, there is a weird inconsistency in File.cpp ReadChunk between 5.6.x. and 5.7 5.6.x https://github.com/hmailserver/hma...
- 2024-02-01 13:16
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Minidump...
- Replies: 36
- Views: 3746
Re: Minidump...
The "If (bytes)" statement is inspired by code elsewhere in hMailServer using code similar to "std::shared_ptr<ByteBuffer> bytes = file.ReadChunk(iCount);" Yeah, that seems to be it, there is a weird inconsistency in File.cpp ReadChunk between 5.6.x. and 5.7 5.6.x https://github.com/hmailserver/hma...
- 2024-01-27 11:57
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Distribution list export
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2010
Re: Distribution list export
Getting an error with this code. It's looking for an additional ( or something. ...."an addional" what? Detail. Logs. Give us something to work with. If lcase(oDomain.DistributionLists.Item(k).Address) = lcase(DistListName &"@" & YourDomain) Then For j = 0 To oMessage .Recipients.Count -1 For i = 0...