hMailServer forum

RvdH

Excuse me for hijacking another topic :mrgreen: @Soren I was just thinking out load And to be honest, I still havn't got a clue on what you are trying to accomplish..must say it looks like a very specific thingy Maybe you investigate recepientparser, where postmaster (catch-all) Is checked and perha...

RvdH

Isn't there any domain COM property for Catch-all address? https://www.hmailserver.com/documentation/latest/?page=com_object_domain Or is this one? string Postmaster The postmaster for this domain. E-mail sent to an nonexistent address will be redirected to this address. Old setting perhaps? I don'...

RvdH

Isn't there any domain COM property for Catch-all address? https://www.hmailserver.com/documentation/latest/?page=com_object_domain Or is this one? string Postmaster The postmaster for this domain. E-mail sent to an nonexistent address will be redirected to this address. Old setting perhaps? I don't...

RvdH

The pursuit of perfection is always a worthy goal. It sure is Perhaps move the functionality of the while loop of RecipientParser::AddRecipient_() to the end of SMTPDeliverer::PreprocessMessage_() somehow ... :?: @SorenR I think this might be very hard to accomplish, not to mention it is undesired ...

RvdH

SorenR wrote: ↑
2021-04-13 16:59

RvdH wrote: ↑
2021-04-13 15:46

palinka wrote: ↑
2021-04-13 15:43

Please don't drag me into your bug/feature feud.
lol
Perhaps move the functionality of the while loop of RecipientParser::AddRecipient_() to the end of SMTPDeliverer::PreprocessMessage_() somehow ...

Knock yourself out (if you think it is worth it)

RvdH

Is that a bug or a feature? :lol: In any case, that's the intended behavior. The OP didn't ask for multiple recipients. I don't use it that way either. There's more than one way to skin a cat. If he wants these server messages to go out to multiple recipients, then its better to set up an array of ...

RvdH

You would only be able to address the first recipient Is that a bug or a feature? :lol: In any case, that's the intended behavior. The OP didn't ask for multiple recipients. I don't use it that way either. There's more than one way to skin a cat. If he wants these server messages to go out to multi...

RvdH

Example; Only account is john.doe Recipients: john.doe@myserver.inc, honest.john@myserver.inc, bill.gates@myserver.inc hms translate recpients to: john.doe@myserver.inc, bucket@myserver.inc, bucket@myserver.inc ... and reduces the list to: john.doe@myserver.inc, bucket@myserver.inc And herein lies ...

RvdH

I would have killed that message in OnAccept.... ;-) Me too, but this was just a test to trigger the specific event :lol: I am thinking about doing some stuff diffently in yesterdays commit related to the oMessage object...eg: turning it arround not moving the event trigger but moving the Persisten...

RvdH

Code: Select all

9160	"2021-04-13 09:14:01.580"	"OnDeliveryFailed: '' - ***@***.com - spambox@***.com - 'Message delivery cancelled during OnDeliverMessage-event'"

PS, no message object there as well, the first param (between single quotes) should be the oMessage.Subject, Events.cpp L96

RvdH

What's with the "Message delivery cancelled during OnDeliverMessage-event" ?? I cannot remember ever seeing that. Not sure, have to admit i never seen this as well...but then again i just recently enabled logging in OnDeliveryFailed I asume this is called when Result.Value = 1 is being set in OnDel...

RvdH

SorenR wrote: ↑
2021-04-12 21:12

RvdH wrote: ↑
2021-04-12 20:58
Settings>Protocols>SMTP>Advanced> Number of recipients in batch
That's outgoing...

Ah, OK

RvdH

Settings>Protocols>SMTP>Advanced> Number of recipients in batch

RvdH

Yeah, i looked up error 453 as well before....seems like a stange errorcode to return
I was more wondering why and for what purpose is was included in hm (especially as it isn't even documentated in hm docs)
For a mailserver that doesn't accept any mail from the outside? Seems harsh...

RvdH

Btw, do you know where result value 3 is for? It isn't documented at all (the last time I checked)

RvdH

There is a feature request sub forum, and you have github to ask for features

'OnDeliveryRejected' will be a though one I think, as you have to write it (if done correctly) for manual rejections in OnHelo, OnSMTPData, etc etc as well

RvdH

The fuzz was about logic. You cannot call something you do deliberately a failure! If a rule delete an email => poof, gone - and do you really want to know if someone is sending you a virus? Do you really need to know if a local client made a typo in an recepient emailaddress they send a mail to? ....

RvdH

https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=224959#p224959 https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=224989#p224989 (this one is really funny, reading all you said yesterday...virusscan is also DENIED and no FAILURE, not? :) ) BTW, none of the changes made that relate to the oMessage o...

RvdH

Your current changes to AWStats on 5.6.8 ... It seems I already had some of them (first one and the last one in SMTPDeliverer.cpp), that's why I did not have the AWStats problem ?!? This must have been an issue some time ago. I wonder why you did not have them as I do not recall having put them in ...

RvdH

You don't get the point... it ALWAYS threated this as a FAILURE, I have not changed anything there...this is no fix to change the internal logic This is about the oMessage object being empty in OnDeliveryFailed Event in one case and filled in another case, nothing more nothing less Perhaps no one r...

RvdH

You don't get the point... it ALWAYS threated this as a FAILURE, I have not changed anything there...this is no fix to change the internal logic

This is about the oMessage object being empty in OnDeliveryFailed Event in one case and filled in another case, nothing more nothing less

RvdH

Well... If you deliberately on purpose and forcefully delete the message before final delivery... Did it then FAIL delivery or was it DENIED delivery? :mrgreen: Actually, since the action is performed by a rule it may be regarded as premeditated and thus it cannot be a failure. 8) This change doesn...

RvdH

So the solution is to call AWStats::LogDeliveryFailure() inside SMTPDeliverer::RunGlobalRules before the message is deleted? :mrgreen: bool SMTPDeliverer::PreprocessMessage_(std::shared_ptr<Message> pMessage, String &sendersIP, RuleResult &globalRuleResult) { ... // Apply rules on this message. if (...

RvdH

PS, you still using awstats logging? Everytime Events::FireOnDeliveryFailed() is called (in SMTPDeliverer.cpp & ExternalDelivery.cpp) there is always a call to AWStats::LogDeliveryFailure() just before..... but yet in Events.cpp, i see this again: AWStats::LogDeliveryFailure(sSendersIP, pMessage->G...

RvdH

pMessage->GetFromAddress() is the SMTP MAIL FROM: ... Yes? It is NOT stored in the RAW EML file but kept in memory until message is released by hMailServer. If message is deleted you cannot access the message headers like "From:" and "Subject:" Should be something like that, allthough stored inside...

RvdH

PS, you still using awstats logging? Everytime Events::FireOnDeliveryFailed() is called (in SMTPDeliverer.cpp & ExternalDelivery.cpp) there is always a call to AWStats::LogDeliveryFailure() just before..... but yet in Events.cpp, i see this again: AWStats::LogDeliveryFailure(sSendersIP, pMessage->Ge...

RvdH

I'm a bit puzzled by this, sRecipientAddress is populated correctly and this value is also taken from pMessage, eg: https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/blob/master/hmailserver/source/Server/SMTP/SMTPDeliverer.cpp#L473-L481 This is strange as that would indicate pMessage is populated on L473 b...

RvdH

Yep, I think so Add an issue to Github >> https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/issues I think this only the case when triggerred by a global rule, not? That makes me believe the original message that should populate the oMessage properties doesn't exist anymore, eg: already delete by the rule...

RvdH

udgesbou wrote: ↑
2021-04-07 13:23
Okay, and where do I have to put that into the script?

Greetings

Maybe simply look at the examples given/quoted?

RvdH

Bob.Dig wrote: ↑
2021-04-07 09:12
But again, I don't want to run it, I want 5.7 with the latest OpenSSl Fix.

Just don't come whining here if something does not work as expected, 5.7 is ALPHA and not offically ready to be used in production environments

RvdH

i do agree i should read "EventFolder" from ini file, as these might (manually) be located outside the InstallLocation folder Dim InstallLocation : InstallLocation = "C:\Program Files\hMailServer" If RegKeyExists("HKLM\SOFTWARE\hMailServer\InstallLocation") Then InstallLocation = RegKeyRead("HKLM\SO...

RvdH

There is more then one road to Rome... i prefer reading it from registry (especially if/when that little issue is fixed)

RvdH

Yes, question is how to locate ini file without using API... assuming service name is hMailServer (why not??) wmic service hmailserver get PathName should return full path to exe could be useful no? Can it really be that simple :mrgreen: Nice catch 8) Confirmed on Windows Server 2003 R2, Windows 10...

RvdH

Constants.vbs is an obfuscated vbs (pentest...to hide sensitive information from prying eyes), containing public constants, like: ADMIN, PASSWORD, MYSQL table, username, password and some API keys (blocklist.de, abusipdb) Dim InstallLocation : InstallLocation = "C:\Program Files\hMailServer" If RegK...

RvdH

This is not a support forum for roundcube but i'll give you some pointers though...
roundcube is hosted on the same server?

config.inc.php

Code: Select all

$config['default_host'] = 'localhost';

$config['default_port'] = 143;

$config['smtp_server'] = 'localhost';

$config['smtp_port'] = 587;

RvdH

As you seem to have tampered with a lot of the default values it is impossible to tell what is wrong

Run this and post the results.
https://hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic ... 20&t=30914

RvdH

Trying to connect to TCP/IP address 11.22.33.44 on port 25. Received: * OK IMAPrev1. IMAP :?: Port 25 = SMTP port :!: I would suggest you restore the defaults....what gave you the brilliant idea to tamper with default settings in the first place? Take a look here: https://www.hmailserver.com/docume...

RvdH

I Tried reading InstallLocation from registry to get the path dynamically (without calling oApp.Authenticate) ....but this seems wrong for 64-bit, already opened a issue We have various options after CreateObject("hMailServer.Application") and .Authenticate is called, but the point is i need it befo...

RvdH

I was trying to make some path(s) in my script dynamic, eg: compatible between x86 and x64 version One of the first things i tried is to include some external files relative to EventHandlers.vbs Dim FSO Set FSO= CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") WriteLog(FSO.GetAbsolutePathName(".")) Set FS...

RvdH

This works with the HELO/EHLO greeting BUT... It COULD be modified to work with the resolved IP Address thus it can be run on servers pre-OnHELO. https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=205049#p205049 Yes, and that basically is what the OP is asking for Mine above, is a enhanced version o...

RvdH

@RvdH I like most improvements, what I still miss is a whitelist for domains that ignore graylisting. e.g. *.outbound.protection.outlook.com There are some scripts, but it's not a nice solution. Could you add such an option? It sounds like you would like to greylistwhitelist connection based on HEL...

RvdH

EventLog.Write(oMessage.HeaderValue("X-hMailServer-LoopCount") < 1) result: "Script Error: Source: Microsoft VBScript runtime error - Error: 800A000D - Description: Type mismatch: '[string: ""]' EventLog.Write(oMessage.HeaderValue("X-hMailServer-LoopCount") > 0) result: "Script Error: Source: Micro...

RvdH

If oMessage.HeaderValue("X-hMailServer-LoopCount") = "" Then I don't think that header exists wehn it's empty.... oMessage.HeaderValue("X-hMailServer-LoopCount") only is added when loopcount > 0 +1 Better to say: if oMessage.HeaderValue("X-hMailServer-LoopCount") < 1 then..... as that would trigger...

RvdH

If oMessage.HeaderValue("X-hMailServer-LoopCount") = "" Then

I don't think that header exists wehn it's empty.... oMessage.HeaderValue("X-hMailServer-LoopCount") only is added when loopcount > 0

RvdH

Latest is 5.6.8-B2538.30 Just install the latest production and/or beta artifact from the URL below, then copy and overwrite files in this archive in hmailserver '/bin' directory https://build.hmailserver.com/viewLog.html?buildId=1216&buildTypeId=HMailServer_BuildHMailServer56&tab=artifacts (login ...

RvdH

I'm just wondering why SPAMC is limited at 256 MB ... http://byteconvert.org/ 5MB has been sufficient in hmailserver for most of us (for so long)... with spamc 256 MB is huge, but most likely they have been thinking the same...if it's that big it simply can't be spam Maybe we should forget about th...

RvdH

Hmm... It seems the maximum message size spamc can send is 256 MB Check "--max-size=" https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/spamc.html 256 MB = 262144 KB ~ 13422 iterations ... No ? If we were using spamc then yes....but hmailserver uses a it's own internal spamc like client, see SpamAssis...

RvdH

int maxSizeToScanKB = 1024 * 50;

Exactly the same outcome as your 4, 5 extra lines of code

Ah....your editing, pfff confusing...anyway, dinner is ready...i'll check back later

RvdH

if (config.GetAntiSpamMaxSizeKB() > 0) defaultSizeToScanKB = config.GetAntiSpamMaxSizeKB(); This still doesn't take in account the 100000 (maxIterations) x 20000 (chunk) that potential causes an exception and can crash the server, better catch that here You missed this config.SetAntiSpamMaxSizeKB(m...

RvdH

if (config.GetAntiSpamMaxSizeKB() > 0) defaultSizeToScanKB = config.GetAntiSpamMaxSizeKB(); This still doesn't take in account the 100000 (maxIterations) x 20000 (chunk) that potential causes an exception and can crash the server, better catch that here My initial code was like this...but i'm curre...

RvdH

Now i think of it, if specified max filesize is too big spamd is guaranteed to timeout anyway.... maybe not the best/useful change

RvdH

@SorenR I noticed your commit here: https://github.com/SorenRR/hmailserver/commit/88dd13612ffff101a3f174a5d9c07c7fcebd856f First of all, i like the idea how you did this and disposing the hardlimit altogether when; if (config.GetAntiSpamMaxSizeKB() > 0) but i think this might be a problem with: http...

RvdH

https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=220644#p220644 https://www.hmailserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=222860#p222860 Looks like this MX -> CNAME issue isn't that new...although i could not instantly remember it (getting old i think :mrgreen: ) a little notable thing ... ALL of the exam...

RvdH

viewtopic.php?p=220644#p220644
viewtopic.php?p=222860#p222860
Looks like this MX -> CNAME issue isn't that new...although i could not instantly remember it (getting old i think

)

RvdH

Not the first 'issue' with the changed DNS lookup routine in 5.7.x builds, eg: https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/pull/319 Well guess that's exactly why it is still ALPHA...i assume he currently is using an dravion 64-bit build that he has been posting publicly on the forums, to bad we can ...

RvdH

MX records pointing to an IP address are illegal ... Sort of :wink: hmailserver-master (5.7 ??) DNSResolver.cpp line 216 to 221 ... { // Okay, this is an invalid MX record. The MX record should always contain // a host name but in this case it appears an IP address. We'll be kind to // the domain o...

RvdH

jimimaseye wrote: ↑
2021-03-30 16:31
The rela proof would be for someone with 5.6 to send an email to objednavky@pentaservis.cz to see if it goes.

Someone....or all of us?

RvdH

Not the first 'issue' with the changed DNS lookup routine in 5.7.x builds, eg: https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/pull/319 Well guess that's exactly why it is still ALPHA...i assume he currently is using an dravion 64-bit build that he has been posting publicly on the forums, to bad we can c...

RvdH

FYI I identified 2 or 3 years ago that Mx records entered as CNAMEs were causing lookup problems in 5.7 (where they did not have a problem in 5.6 production). This was reported on Github that martin has acknowledged with view to fix on 5.7. It is acknowledged that mx records SHOULDNT be entered as ...

RvdH

FYI I identified 2 or 3 years ago that Mx records entered as CNAMEs were causing lookup problems in 5.7 (where they did not have a problem in 5.6 production). This was reported on Github that martin has acknowledged with view to fix on 5.7. It is acknowledged that mx records SHOULDNT be entered as ...

Search found 1314 matches