Search found 1105 matches

by RvdH
2020-02-26 12:36
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

Okay, so I'm 99% sure we found the problem. It's right there in the code you posted. The code considers FAIL and PASS results...but the SPF test CAN apparently return NEUTRAL: https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/blob/master/hmailserver/source/Server/SMTP/SPF/SPF.h The greylisting bypass code...
by RvdH
2020-02-26 12:09
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

Neutral isn't scored on SPF test, because you received "0" score the conclusion is SPF check passed for both test std::set<std::shared_ptr<SpamTestResult> > SpamTestSPF::RunTest(std::shared_ptr<SpamTestData> pTestData) { std::set<std::shared_ptr<SpamTestResult> > setSpamTestResults; String sMessage ...
by RvdH
2020-02-25 16:41
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

For hmailserver?
the ARSoft.Tools.Net is written in C#, and hmailserver is written in C++
by RvdH
2020-02-25 15:28
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

I get that ... I have not been really deep into the rmspf.cpp code but is that not the way it works? It would seem a complete waste of time and cpu cycles to continue to the end and if that is the case then we have a different problem with SPF ... Most likely Off-topic... I myself am a bit curious ...
by RvdH
2020-02-25 14:00
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

Anything wrong with that? It appears that only 2 of 10 lookups are used. If we assume the evaluation is performed (top down) the same way hMailServer is doing it (still need to see a WireShark trace of the DNS data exchange) then the "_spf.salesforce.com" record is not even queried thus the macro i...
by RvdH
2020-02-25 13:53
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

https://vamsoft.com/support/tools/spf-policy-tester seems to stop processing once a match (pass result) is found, and therefor is not expanding/walking all spf record values
by RvdH
2020-02-25 13:41
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

SorenR wrote:
2020-02-25 12:39
Yes, RFC says that if sender is not found the HELO/EHLO greeting should be used. :roll:
Should, but hmailserver does not check SPF for HELO/EHLO altogether ....therefor my initial remark saying SPF testing in hmailserver is very limited/basic
by RvdH
2020-02-25 10:07
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

Maybe the SPF record has more then 10 lookups? RMSPF.cpp#L137 https://sendgrid.com/.../spf-limitations/ i count just 4 lookups... include:_spf.fireeyecloud.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com exists:%{i}._spf.mta.salesforce.com The "include", "a", "mx", "ptr", and "ex...
by RvdH
2020-02-24 20:44
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

I'm afraid we will have to rework - or look for an alternative SPF Lookup solution. It appears the author of the current solution (Roger Moser) is no longer serving the e-mail and conferencing needs of sincere followers of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada ... ISKCON ... commonly...
by RvdH
2020-02-24 10:44
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: Greylisting by subnetwork
Replies: 96
Views: 41515

Re: Greylisting by subnetwork

  • fixed a bug in mx:domain.com lookup
  • added support for exists:%{i} and exists:%{ir} SPF records
by RvdH
2020-02-23 20:59
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

I'm working on a debug trace but that won't happen until Monday. The problem 100% exists that something in the VALID olg.ca SPF record is causing hMailServer to fail the SPF check though. Wireshark ?? I believe you should be able to filter "dns.spf" ... I need OLG to send me an email first :) They ...
by RvdH
2020-02-23 20:46
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

Sure, fine by me...i don't care much if it returns the expected ip address, but it my opinion it should (most i tested do) For example: 52.31.115.240 send a mail, spf exists:%{i}._spf.sparkpostmail.com is in place there 52.31.115.240._spf.sparkpostmail.com resolves to A RR 52.31.115.240 It literall...
by RvdH
2020-02-23 20:40
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

That's not the macro though. As stated in the op, the macros is exists:%{i}._spf.mta.salesforce.com. So if the email server is 1.2.3.4, it will verify that 1.2.3.4._spf.mta.salesforce.com exists, and that DNS server is setup to only respond with valid records for authorized email servers, which is ...
by RvdH
2020-02-23 20:21
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

As far i understand the exists:%{i} macro doesn't do much more as checking if the value in %{i} resolves to any A-record, the returned IP address does not need to match that of the sender. So this apparently is the worst option that you can define in your spf record as it security wise doesn't veri...
by RvdH
2020-02-22 23:40
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

Me too I think the point of this thread though specifically is the 'don't greylist on spf pass' option True, but we only have seen a claim that says hmailserver fails spf verification if a SPF record containing exists:%{i} exists :) Greylisting in my view, has been fairly ineffective since gMail an...
by RvdH
2020-02-22 23:25
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

probably second worst behind +all which allows ANY IP address ✅ As long as hmailserver ignores exists:%{i} and/or doesn't give false positives once it encounters such SPF record we should be good in my opinion, but I like many others here do not rely on hmailserver anti-spam masseurs, and have spam...
by RvdH
2020-02-22 22:54
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

As far i understand the exists:%{i} macro doesn't do much more as checking if the value in %{i} resolves to any A-record, the returned IP address does not need to match that of the sender. So this apparently is the worst option that you can define in your spf record as it security wise doesn't verif...
by RvdH
2020-02-22 20:32
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

For now we only have a claim spf isn't working, it might as well be a DNS problem... or did someone actually test hmailserver's behavior when it encounteres a spf record using the exists:%{1} macro implementation? Haven't seen a debug log (yet)
by RvdH
2020-02-22 19:19
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

Well, that is most likely because spamassassin does a better job checking spf.....hmailserver doesn't do anything other then checking the sending ip against DNS spf record There are quite a few macro's that could be used, for example %{h} that validates the message helo/ehlo, %{s} with senders email...
by RvdH
2020-02-22 18:33
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

SorenR wrote:
2020-02-22 18:17
Attached files compile on my 5.6.8 and seems not to crash when run... 8)
The question should be if it validates SPF records properly :)
SorenR wrote:
2020-02-22 18:17
PS... What does your .24 version cover ??? SURBL ??? :wink:
Yup, its the altered SURBL regex
by RvdH
2020-02-22 18:11
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SPF not working correctly
Replies: 95
Views: 50785

Re: SPF not working correctly

I noticed mattg placed a pull request in github... I dunno if that is tested code or if he simply replaced the libs without building/testing
by RvdH
2020-02-22 18:06
Forum: General discussions
Topic: .eml files not being removed from Data folder
Replies: 20
Views: 11161

Re: .eml files not being removed from Data folder

@cblaze22, maybe pasting your hmailserver's Admin password is not smartest thing to do on a open forum :!:
by RvdH
2020-02-21 14:21
Forum: User-submitted tutorials
Topic: auto forward from localhost to pop server
Replies: 5
Views: 4361

Re: auto forward from localhost to pop server

User-submitted tutorials :?: :!:
by RvdH
2020-02-09 17:11
Forum: Scripting
Topic: Problem with AutoBan
Replies: 18
Views: 8027

Re: Problem with AutoBan

👍
by RvdH
2020-02-08 12:29
Forum: Scripting
Topic: Problem with AutoBan
Replies: 18
Views: 8027

Re: Problem with AutoBan

SorenR wrote: You have a problem with the "disconnect.exe"...
Windows smartscreen filter? Tried to see if it's blocked?

the source of disconnect is pasted here, it doesn't take any other parameters as IP1 [IP2 [IP3 [IPn]]]
by RvdH
2020-01-30 19:12
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

palinka wrote:
2020-01-30 18:21
RvdH wrote:
2020-01-30 17:02
Can you pm the source to me so i could have a look?

I am a bit surprised to see 16 matches and lookups, especially because a hardcoded limit of 15 is defined in the code

Code: Select all

const int maxURLsToProcess = 15;
:o
0-15 = 16 iterations. :D
:oops:
by RvdH
2020-01-30 17:02
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

Can you pm the source to me so i could have a look?

I am a bit surprised to see 16 matches and lookups, especially because a hardcoded limit of 15 is defined in the code

Code: Select all

const int maxURLsToProcess = 15;
:o
by RvdH
2020-01-30 16:39
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

@RvdH I updated hmailServer almost the same email came again without ")". "DEBUG" 1116 "2020-01-30 13:22:53.636" "SURBL: Execute" "DEBUG" 1116 "2020-01-30 13:22:53.636" "SURBL: Found URL: webbdagarna.se" "DEBUG" 1116 "2020-01-30 13:22:53.636" "SURBL: Found URL: trippus.se" "DEBUG" 1116 "2020-01-30 ...
by RvdH
2020-01-30 12:45
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

@tunis

If your signature is right you are still using 5.6.x, right?
I have a 5.6.8-B2494.24 build (at the usual place) using the above regex if you like to give it a test run
by RvdH
2020-01-30 10:41
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

Please stay on topic, this post is about SURBL url detection I think the 'best' regex i have come up and tested is: (?:(?>https?)?(?>:\/\/|\%3A\%2F\%2F))(?:www\.)?([a-z0-9\-\.\=\r\n]+) To have a perfect regex seems impossible, as the are so many possibilities with formatting, encoding, line-breaks i...
by RvdH
2020-01-29 15:51
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

Base64 Encoded maybe?


This regex ain't never gonna be 100% i think, to much quirks
by RvdH
2020-01-29 04:44
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

This regex thingy is keeping me awake :) Instead of defining every character that is NOT allowed, like: (?:https?:\/\/)(?:[^@\s]+@)?(?:www\.)?([^\?:#<>\s{}[\]()\/\\'\"]+) https://regexr.com/4t4u3 Wouldn't it be easier to specify what characters are allowed? (eg: alphanumeric, dot and dash) (?:https?...
by RvdH
2020-01-29 02:42
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

I checked the email and all links are like this one. href="https://dmd.idg.se/x/c/?LU.RbsMgDPyVvtCnqQ0hbMokq2q3L1gf9jgRQAldDJEDivb1DLLJtnQn_3w6DbLNCB3vmz7PILnseSbgont_EXmCKcZlfT2ft207kR3srLwZHJmTDnhJEb90WmNAJm.bwuT7v.BJtsd9qXBRbvTwaYfBqFGRV6xt7jHo7ynMWHAtVlvcH6kA.1Mv1vhgb4JdO.KBCndlFgojKUQb999rSKQt...
by RvdH
2020-01-28 21:44
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

OK, as it seems BOOST needs some weird extra escaping But i would say, using a regex like: (?:https?:\\/\\/)([^\\?&><\\[\\(#\\\\ \\\"'\\/\\)\\]]*) would solve the issues, see example here: https://regexr.com/4t4ap Could the X-Spam-Report (bad) formatting also be caused by a malformed regex? It appe...
by RvdH
2020-01-28 20:58
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

OK, as it seems BOOST needs some weird extra escaping

But i would say, using a regex like: (?:https?:\\/\\/)([^\\?&><\\[\\(#\\\\ \\\"'\\/\\)\\]]*) would solve the issues, see example here: https://regexr.com/4t4ap
by RvdH
2020-01-28 13:47
Forum: General discussions
Topic: URL send to SURBL
Replies: 24
Views: 10616

Re: URL send to SURBL

What HMS version?

I think te regex used to detect URL's for SURBL checking is faulty,
https://github.com/hmailserver/hmailser ... BL.cpp#L43

Or does BOOST use some weird/custom regex?
by RvdH
2020-01-18 23:18
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Adding rejected IP's by DNS Blacklists to IpRanges or Firewall
Replies: 5
Views: 2015

Re: Adding rejected IP's by DNS Blacklists to IpRanges or Firewall

adrianmihai83, are you sure your mailserver isn't acting as an open relay? Or maybe a single account is hijacked?
Normally the Internet range should require 'Require SMTP authentication' for 'local to local'
by RvdH
2020-01-17 10:45
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: hMailServer-5.7.0-B2495-x64 User build
Replies: 42
Views: 17407

Re: hMailServer-5.7.0-B2495-x64 User build

Dravion wrote:
2020-01-16 23:07
TLSv1.3 was added in hMailServer 5.7 x64 which made serveral code changes necessary. This means OpenSSL
series 1.1.x is required.
Also available in 5.6.8 - Build 2494 (latest official beta)
by RvdH
2020-01-15 12:25
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: RvdH DNSResolver + Powershell
Replies: 4
Views: 2756

Re: RvdH DNSResolver + Powershell

Do not reverse the IP, you are trying to make a PTR lookup :!:

Code: Select all

$IP = '221.120.216.98'
$DNS = New-Object -ComObject DNSLibrary.DNSResolver
$PTR = $DNS.PTR("$IP")
Write-Host $PTR

Code: Select all

lhr63.pie.net.pk
by RvdH
2020-01-13 11:54
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: Avast corporate IP SPAMMER
Replies: 2
Views: 1932

Re: Avast corporate IP SPAMMER

Or maybe it is just a isolated test box in their corporate network to monitor, study and learn malware/virus behavior
by RvdH
2020-01-12 13:23
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: Roundcube 1.4.x markasjunk
Replies: 16
Views: 5586

Re: Roundcube 1.4.x markasjunk

:oops: :oops: :oops: Sorry guys, seems my original command worked just fine once i added access & read/write permission for IUSR on 'C:\Windows\system32\config\systemprofile\.spamassassin' the complete commands are: $config['markasjunk_spam_cmd'] = '"C:\Program Files\JAM Software\SpamAssassin for Wi...
by RvdH
2020-01-10 10:50
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Removing specified x-headers from all outgoing SMTP mails?
Replies: 4
Views: 1135

Re: Removing specified x-headers from all outgoing SMTP mails?

Hello, sorry, outgoing emails are NOT anonymized by this filtering! :?: FROM:, TO:, AUTHENTICATED: and so on are still present, but some useless and often non standard header informations are removed. And, main reason, removing hints about mailer, security proxies aso. reduce helpful informations f...
by RvdH
2020-01-10 09:17
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: Roundcube 1.4.x markasjunk
Replies: 16
Views: 5586

Re: Roundcube 1.4.x markasjunk

1: Create a symbolic link... mklink /D "C:\Program Files\JAM Software\SpamAssassin for Windows" "C:\SpamAssassin" 2: Edit the config.php $config['markasjunk_spam_cmd'] = 'C:\SpamAssassin\sa-learn.exe --spam %f -D 2>&1'; $config['markasjunk_ham_cmd'] = 'C:\SpamAssassin\sa-learn.exe --ham %f -D 2>&1'...
by RvdH
2020-01-09 22:03
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: Roundcube 1.4.x markasjunk
Replies: 16
Views: 5586

Re: Roundcube 1.4.x markasjunk

$config['markasjunk_spam_cmd'] = 'C:\Program Files\JAM Software\SpamAssassin for Windows\sa-learn.exe --spam %f -D 2>&1'; $config['markasjunk_ham_cmd'] = 'C:\Program Files\JAM Software\SpamAssassin for Windows\sa-learn.exe --ham %f -D 2>&1'; Yeah, i found that debug info elsewhere as well....but it...
by RvdH
2020-01-09 14:27
Forum: Off-topic discussions
Topic: Roundcube 1.4.x markasjunk
Replies: 16
Views: 5586

Roundcube 1.4.x markasjunk

The old markasjunk2 plugin is now part off the new Roundcube 1.4.x distribution (named markasjunk) I was trying to get this plugin working, with sa-learn (using cmd_learn driver) $config['markasjunk_learning_driver'] = 'cmd_learn'; $config['markasjunk_debug'] = true; (this makes a \logs\markasjunk.l...
by RvdH
2020-01-04 03:23
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: hMailServer-5.7.0-B2495-x64 User build
Replies: 42
Views: 17407

Re: hMailServer-5.7.0-B2495-x64 User build

I really wonder why anyone would try to use this release? ....there is absolutely nothing in it that isn't the latest beta build except for the updated boost libraries...there is absolutely no added functionalities....please explain, why bother? https://build.hmailserver.com/viewLog.html?buildId=802...
by RvdH
2019-12-19 22:24
Forum: Development & alpha discussions
Topic: Latest version of BOOST.
Replies: 3
Views: 2584

Re: Latest version of BOOST.

Anyone got an idea why BOOST 1.70.0 is preferred over the latest version? Who says BOOST 1.70.0 is preferred over the latest version? Maybe simply because those newer releases are released after the latest commits done by martin? (he merged some pull request since, and upgraded openssl but nothing ...
by RvdH
2019-11-21 02:18
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm
Replies: 11
Views: 2386

Re: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm

Are SURBL queries blocking? Could they introduce a delay of 30 seconds, enough to trigger a TCP receive timeout? Nah, SURBL check are done by SpamAssassin, none enabled in hmailserver itself.... and btw, it's a 30 minutes delay until the timeout, not 30 seconds PS: If possible, run Wireshark in cas...
by RvdH
2019-11-20 18:28
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Export list of blocked attachments
Replies: 3
Views: 1091

Re: Export list of blocked attachments

Option Explicit Public Const ADMIN = "Administrator" Public Const PASSWORD = "PUT_YOUR_PASSWORD_HERE" 'Password for hMailServer Administrator Dim fso, file Const ForWriting = 2 Set fso = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") set file = fso.OpenTextFile("C:\BlockedAttachments.tmp", ForWriting, ...
by RvdH
2019-11-20 16:54
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm
Replies: 11
Views: 2386

Re: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm

To make it more confusing, this one came thru without a glitch... but then again, apart from similar HELO (i am monitoring troublesome host by their HELO message) this ip doesn't seem designated to Adobe "SMTPD" 6376 124993 "2019-11-20 15:19:30.215" "62.210.194.156" "SENT: 220 mail.domain.com ESMTP"...
by RvdH
2019-11-20 16:34
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm
Replies: 11
Views: 2386

Re: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm

Nope, no wait()

Or at least not directly within OnSMTPData, I use that lockfile function in OnHELO for AddGreyList(oClient.IPAddress, oClient.HELO) for my dynamic greywhitelisting function, but even that function is not triggered on those domains
by RvdH
2019-11-20 15:27
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm
Replies: 11
Views: 2386

Re: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm

Some MTAs are configured for sending only while other MTAs are configured for inbound only mail. I talking about our own hmailserver instance that is allowed to send and receive I have dozens of log entries like the above designating from Adobe owned servers trying to send to our hmailserver instan...
by RvdH
2019-11-20 12:46
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm
Replies: 11
Views: 2386

Re: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm

These are just 2 examples i see regularly....but this is going on for a few months. I assume these are simply marketing e-mails In OnSMTPData i have no more then the check(s) that block mail when the message is not sent from the authenticated account/domain (eg: only checks are for authenticated use...
by RvdH
2019-11-20 12:21
Forum: General discussions
Topic: SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm
Replies: 11
Views: 2386

SMTPD timeouts, one particular server farm

I have been busy monitoring SMTPD connections that seem to have trouble receiving mail right our hmailserver instance sends the DATA command to the external (sending) server, below an example: "SMTPD" 6376 119919 "2019-11-20 09:34:08.238" "66.117.17.55" "SENT: 220 mail.domain.com ESMTP" "SMTPD" 1064...
by RvdH
2019-11-19 14:55
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Fake SURBL DNSBL from local network
Replies: 16
Views: 3023

Re: Fake SURBL DNSBL from local network

Ruser wrote:
2019-11-15 15:01
RvdH wrote:
2019-11-15 13:11
cached DNS lookup result maybe?
i set google DNS in computer settings:
Ruser wrote:
2019-11-15 10:28
static ip=192.168.0.172, dns=8.8.8.8
where cache? my router "mikrotik", ISP?
i try router off/on...

Code: Select all

ipconfig /flushdns
by RvdH
2019-11-19 09:46
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Fake SURBL DNSBL from local network
Replies: 16
Views: 3023

Re: Fake SURBL DNSBL from local network

Could it be because of 'SURBL detection properly fails to detect url's ending with a query string issue #108' in < 5.7.0 builds?

Perhaps you could try my custom build, that should fix above issue
5.6.8-B2494.22.7z
(969.3 KiB) Downloaded 105 times
by RvdH
2019-11-15 13:11
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Fake SURBL DNSBL from local network
Replies: 16
Views: 3023

Re: Fake SURBL DNSBL from local network

multi.surbl.org lists domain cb-killer.ru as a spammer, not hmailserver
hmailserver only checks the domain against multi.surbl.org

[EDIT]
I see your point... doing the lookup with http://www.surbl.org/surbl-analysis the result is: cb-killer.ru is NOT listed

Weird...cached DNS lookup result maybe?
by RvdH
2019-11-15 10:44
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Fake SURBL DNSBL from local network
Replies: 16
Views: 3023

Re: Fake SURBL DNSBL from local network

Mmmm, right :!: :?:
...but what is your actual question?

cb-killer.ru is a existing domain, which actually can be listed in multi.surbl.org (and apparently is)
DNSBL lookups seem fine
by RvdH
2019-11-13 13:52
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Autoban weirdness
Replies: 17
Views: 3480

Re: Autoban weirdness

Has he also changed the default internet and Localhost rages Priority Only the 'My computer' range is higher, eg: 30 instead of the 15 it was before.... 'Internet' range is still 10 Nothing changed for me - meaning I upgraded and my old settings remained the same, but the new autoban = 100 was unkn...